Wade's New Proposal
|
Wadester
Registered Posting Freak Quote:Originally posted by Boomcheck@Nov 22 2013, 02:50 PM We had Grinders before. Not PWFs.
Wadester
Registered Posting Freak Quote:Originally posted by xDParker@Nov 22 2013, 02:52 PM This took the ideas that the league came up with last night and put them together in a good way. Your idea that you stole from stud definitely was one of the stronger influences doe.
RomanesEuntDomus
Appeals Committee S10 Challenge Cup Champion
That looks a lot better than the previous proposal
xDParK
Registered S28 Challenge Cup Champion
typical scum wade
Former SHL Head Commissioner S12ish-S27ish GM S8 & S9 (Won cups both years) 2x GM Of The Year 5 Time Cup Winner League MVP Past Players D - Aidan Richan - (S5 11th Overall) C - Chico Salmon - (S17 1st overall) Current Player D - Chico Smeb (S46) SMJHL - Drafted 65th Overall by SHL - Drafted 23rd Overall by
Wadester
Registered Posting Freak Quote:Originally posted by OcAirlines@Nov 22 2013, 02:56 PM Winter has no complaints. WE DID IT GUYS!!!!!!
RomanesEuntDomus
Appeals Committee S10 Challenge Cup Champion Quote:Originally posted by Wadester@Nov 22 2013, 08:58 PM I'll find something, don't worry
Chris-McZehrl
Registered S18, S23, S27, S34, S37, S46 Challenge Cup Champion Quote:Originally posted by Wadester@Nov 22 2013, 08:37 PM 70 - 80 = 2 TPE(40 for 80 ... now 30) + 10 TPE 80 - 85 = 3 TPE(55 for 85 ... now 40) + 15 TPE 85 - 90 = 4 TPE(75 for 90 ... now 55) + 20 TPE 90 - 95 = 6 TPE(105 for 95 ... now 75) + 30 TPE 95 - 99 = 7 TPE(133 for 99 ... now 95) + 38 TPE Challenge Cup Wins: S18 - Seattle Riot (with Chris McZehrl)* S23 - New England Wolfpack (with Chris McZehrl)* S27 - Calgary Dragons (with VLAD McZehrl) S34 - Manhattan Rage (with VLAD McZehrl) S37 - Winnipeg Jets (with VLAD McZehrl) S46 - Buffalo Stampede (with GOD McZehrl)* *first ever Challenge Cup of Franchise History Four Star Cup Wins: S24 - Vancouver Whalers (with VLAD McZehrl) S39 - St. Louis Scarecrows (with GOD McZehrl) SHL Hall of Fame Members: S24 - Chris McZehrl * (GP: 764 | G: 322 | A: 461 | P: 783 | +/-: +109) S40 - VLAD McZehrl * (GP: 653 | G: 333 | A: 361 | P: 694 | +/-: +141) *1st Ballot Hall of Famer small note: GOD McZehrl played at first as Defender and later as Forward!
xDParK
Registered S28 Challenge Cup Champion
I'd like to see Design your own player type instead of generic player types personally.
Either 2 primary,1 secondary, 1 weakness or 3 primary, 1 weakness
Former SHL Head Commissioner S12ish-S27ish GM S8 & S9 (Won cups both years) 2x GM Of The Year 5 Time Cup Winner League MVP Past Players D - Aidan Richan - (S5 11th Overall) C - Chico Salmon - (S17 1st overall) Current Player D - Chico Smeb (S46) SMJHL - Drafted 65th Overall by SHL - Drafted 23rd Overall by
kikish18
Registered S27, S29, S32 Challenge Cup Champion Quote:Originally posted by Chris-McZehrl@Nov 22 2013, 09:46 PM Hah! Thats true! Its ironic but I'm Offensive D-man :D
Wadester
Registered Posting Freak
Also to be clear. I wanted a scale with around 175-200 TPE to max and settled for 162 in a way we can implement player types and some real diversity in the league.
I hope everyone can accept this compromise.
Wadester
Registered Posting Freak Quote:Originally posted by xDParker@Nov 22 2013, 03:01 PM I like this one because it fits a mold and it's best for the newest members who might not entirely understand STHS (some guys still don't who are vets ) and push them in the direction of certain player types but there are ways to deviate from the median.
BigTittySmitty
Registered S17, S37 Challenge Cup Champion
New Update Scale
50 – 70 = 1 TPE 70 – 80 = 2 TPE 80 – 90 = 5 TPE 90 – 99 = 8 TPE 162 TPE to 99 / 130 to 95 Correct me if I am wrong but if I declare X as a weakness and I want to improve it from 80 --> 81 / 90 --> 91 it will cost me 10 and 16 points respectively? Will you be revisiting the send down 325 TPE rule with this potential update... and what about regression could that be moved later on in a players career. And with regression if I have a skill @ 80 and for simple math we lost 10% would the formula be 40*10% which would reduce by 4 TPE which would put player at 78 for the skill or would it be 80*10% which would 8 TPE which would put player at 76? Code: Credit to Wasty and Steelhead for the sigs - thanks dudes!
leotfatu
Registered Senior Member
Will endurance properly be used this time? Meaning no more 100 condition players if they overplay days after days?
Wadester
Registered Posting Freak
Not to mention chances are you're going to land on one of the options I gave if you have any legit direction with your player.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |