Quote:Originally posted by belgarat+Mar 13 2018, 07:07 PM--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1' id='QUOTE-WRAP'><tr><td>QUOTE (belgarat @ Mar 13 2018, 07:07 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->You yourself ranked Kinsler number 1 in shl top 100 ArGar, he was top 3 as well, fucking joke of a committee[/b]

In which SHL top 100? You mean one season which had multiple people voting on players?

He has three top-10 finishes, which is certainly great, but there are players who had a longer run of consistency and more individual hardware. Based on that alone he is not a lock for the hall and is more likely to get pushed back than others.

Quote:Originally posted by dankoa@Mar 13 2018, 07:08 PM<br />
Ridiculous statement. He was undeniably one of the best players of his generation, team doesn't come into it at all

He can be a great player and be overrated by those who remember the person and his player for what they were to a specific franchise.

<!--QuoteBegin-CampinKiller@Mar 13 2018, 07:08 PM


Oh yes, I must not have a right to an opinion because I didn’t apply for HOF committee, cause I never pay attention to job openings.

I made a simple comment, that was far from “huffy,” but whatever my dude. If I have time tonight I make actually make that argument[/quote]
I'm not saying you don't have a right to an opinion, but this is the second year Texas within a short span of time had multiple people disparaging the process and the committee because a player and member they like hasn't gotten in, yet. No discussion about where they think Kinsler should rank among players in the ballot, no attempts to be part of the actual committee, just peanut gallery posts because Kinsler didn't get a "fair shake" or something. As if the committee has some vendetta against the guy or is missing his Toews-like intangibles that would earn him an easy spot in the Hall.