09-16-2018, 02:40 PMNJBadApple Wrote:

09-16-2018, 02:37 PMTheDangaZone Wrote:

09-16-2018, 02:34 PMFlappyGiraffe Wrote: I don't understand why only these 2 were singled out, plenty of people used that kind of language the past few days. I know they used the words in reference to someone else, but the rule is written that any mention of the words will result in a suspension.

I just posted the correction on this. And it was always contextual. Just worded wrong. That's why they were suspended but some others weren't. Because they were using it with a different definition. That being said I still think there's other words that could be used to express these alternate definitions and I wish we would use them instead of resulting in this type of speech to push buttons and rules for loop holes.

If it's contextual, then why even bother "banning" the word or making a rule about it?  This whole thing is retarding the process of the league moving forward as a welcoming place.

Because it's gotten to a point where it's insane that y'all need to be able to personally attack someone. That TD was atrocious with the amount of hate speech being spewed and this is a step in the right direction. The post just makes it where we updated the penalty for doing what we had before and more so listing a few specific words that will be more looked out for.

Let me ask you this. What reason do you have to personally attack someone that you need to go after someone using any of those words?