11-29-2018, 02:38 PMkit Wrote:

11-29-2018, 02:25 PMcaltroit_red_flames Wrote: If that were true then Argar's player who was created in S21 would have had 4 seasons where his TPE gains were lower than that of the players between S35-S43, but that data I presented shows that to be false unless you can find some sort of mistakes I've made in my assertions.

just because his average tpe gain is around the same of the last 10 seasons doesnt mean it didnt go up from lets say like S20-S28. I have no idea what the numbers are and frankly dont care enough to look into it cuz itd be hard, but the mid-late S20's very well couldve been giving out well above the average tpe thus skewing people like argars and esas average. What youre doing is taking a vague statistic and making leaps when making concluding statements, which is another massive problem in the media and todays politics, and for someone preaching that we need to stay truthful and non-manipulative comes off as a bit hypocritical to me

You're obviously just looking to argue and not willing to put in the time to think about how what you've said doesn't make sense. Alonzo Garbanzo was created in S21. That means if for a single season as a max earner he had any sort of TPE advantage or disadvantage it would be reflected in the average amount of TPE he gained when compared to that of max earners such as King or Coach Biz. But the numbers are nearly identical. I'm not making vague statements, I'm making very compact and specific statements.

For some reason you're unwilling to consider that you may be incorrect about this and I don't know why. At this point you're just wasting my time and trolling, but at least when someone else brings this up I can point to the statistics shown in this thread as evidence of TPE inflation being false and if they find evidence to the contrary then we can have some sort of productive conversation about it.