Bruins10 4/28
|
Bruins10
Registered Posting Freak
GeckoeyGecko
Registered JeckoeyTecko
woa i know u
Sigs 1 and 4: 8/10 Sigs 2 and 3: 9/10 Sig 1: The render reminds me of better times, of when EK was still a sen. Nostalgia! I think its a touch overexposed, though, and not quite as sharp as it could be. To get it to work with a more minimal background, the render has to be hella sharp. Maybe darken it up a touch at the top. Sig 2: y o o o o thats clean. I really like the big number text in the back. The two texts do clash, though, and the drop shadow is just a touch heavy. Sig 3: the render is crisp, the background is clean, i really like the two white bars to box it out. A really good sig! But the lighting at the top and bottom is heavy, and why is it so orange for a whalers dman? :eyes: Sig 4: This sig pops. It's really quite good! However, instead of lightening the borders, I'd say to darken them, making a more solid-looking sig. Try to make the main render pop out a bit more, as well. sorry i couldnt give u a 2 9+9+8+8 = 825+825+950+950 = 3.55 mil + 200k to make it a round number and because these sigs litty titties = 3.75 mil e |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |