Advanced stats 48
|
awils13
Registered Posting Freak
FULL STATS HERE (skaters)
Goalies New stat this season: Off.ZS%, you can read more about it here https://www.litterboxcats.com/2012/8/27/...rs-florida Mind you it's probably completely random in STHS. You can find what each stat means in the S47 article (skaters) and goalies First off, a little analysis on each team 1. Tampa Bay Barracuda (66 points) Record: 28-12-10 Corsi: 48.42 (league rank – 13th) PDO: 1037 (1st) PP + PK: 94.66 (14th) I feel like whenever a goalie posts a sv% significantly above average, you can safely assume the team is overperforming. In S46 Blue carried Tampa to the playoffs with league-leading .919, then in S47 Blue regressed to the average and Tampa finished dead last. This season Tampa led the league in both 5v5sh% and 5v5sv%, resulting in an abnormally high PDO (higher than any team last season). S48 was a step in the right direction but based on numbers Tampa isn’t ready to contend just yet. Verdict: Bad + Lucky This isn’t supposed to take anything away from the incredible season this team had, and Lagerfield and Blue have very strong cases to win some individual awards. 2. New Orleans Specters (65 points) Record: 30-15-5 Corsi: 54.69 (1st) PDO: 994 (11th) PP + PK: 106.60 (3rd) Not quite as dominant as last season but still great possession numbers, and good special teams. Once again more on the unlucky side but 6 points under 1000 is probably within normal variation. Verdict: Good 3. West Kendall Platoon (63 points) Record: 30-17-3 Corsi: 52.23 (3rd) PDO: 1012 (4th) PP + PK: 97.53 (11th) Good at 5 on 5, a bit more lucky than you’d expect but still this is easily a 60+ points team. Terrible on PK but WKP was one of the least penalized teams, so they only allowed 33 PKG which is middle of the pack. They also scored 40 PPG (most in the league), so overall Platoon did pretty well on special teams and the PP + PK ranking is deceiving. Verdict: Good + Lucky 4. Winnipeg Jets (60 points) Record: 29-19-2 Corsi: 49.29 (11th) PDO: 1014 (2nd) PP + PK: 99.39 (8th) Last season Winnipeg was a terrible team that was pretty close to making the playoffs thanks to some puck luck. This season once again they had some lucky sims, except this time it’s more like an average team, so Winnipeg finished with 60 points and won their division fairly easily. Verdict: Average + Lucky (this didn't age well) 5. San Francisco Pride (59 points) Record: 28-19-3 Corsi: 50.94 (6th) PDO: 1001 (7th) PP + PK: 109.91 (1st) Above average team 5 on 5. High 5v5sh%, low 5v5sv% so overall Pride were neither lucky or unlucky. Special teams is where SFP really shined. They scored 36 PPG and allowed only 17 PKGA, for a difference of +19. Verdict: Above average + Great special teams 6. Hamilton Steelhawks (59 points) Record: 27-18-5 Corsi: 51.00 (5th) PDO: 996 (10th) PP + PK: 109.73 (2nd) Not elite but good corsi. League worst shooting % but Kryyst had a good season in net, so the PDO is pretty average. Same as SFP, neither lucky or unlucky. Incredible PP% but only 127 PP opportunities (3rd least in the league, for comparison Edmonton went 31 for 172 on PP). Top 3 in both PK% and PKGA. 59-60 points is right what you'd expect with these numbers Verdict: Above average + Great special teams 7. Toronto North Stars (58 points) Record: 25-17-8 Corsi: 48.63 (12th) PDO: 1013 (3rd) PP + PK: 92.18 (15th) I think Toronto definitely overperformed. Bad and lucky 5 on 5. One of the worst special teams in the league, although worth noting that Toronto was the least penalized team, so they finished with +1 goal differential on special teams, and -1 overall. Verdict: Bad + Lucky + Bad special teams + Disciplined 8. Buffalo Stampede (58 points) Record: 27-19-4 Corsi: 53.00 (2nd) PDO: 998 (8th) PP + PK: 91.02 (16th) Buffalo got outscored by 14 goals on special teams which is the main reason they almost missed the playoffs. But for the third season in a row NOLA, WKP and BUF are the Big 3 of SHL, with all teams making the conference finals this time and with Buffalo eventually winning it all. Verdict: Good + Bad special teams 9. Edmonton Blizzard (55 points) Record: 25-20-5 Corsi: 49.44 (10th) PDO: 986 (15th) PP + PK: 94.78 (13th) Last season Edmonton had the highest PDO, this time Simon wasn’t so kind. Basically the same corsi (below average) but the sh% declined from 11.28 to 9.37, sv% declined from 0.914 to 0.892 and special teams declined from 107.76 to 94.78. As I’ve mentioned Edmonton had the most PP opportunities among all teams, and perhaps that’s the reason they made the playoffs despite a -15 goal differential. Verdict: Below average + Unlucky + Bad special teams 10. Calgary Dragons (55 points) Record: 24-19-7 Corsi: 51.58 (4th) PDO: 1005 (5th) PP + PK: 96.69 (12th) I’m a bit surprised Calgary didn’t finish higher in the standings. Yes, the PP was pretty mediocre and the PK was terrible but Dragons were good 5 on 5 their PDO is on the higher end too. Verdict: Good + Bad special teams 11. New England Wolfpack (54 points) Record: 26-22-2 Corsi: 50.64 (7th) PDO: 1001 (6th) PP + PK: 99.34 (9th) Now we’ve reached non-playoff teams. NEW almost made it. The reason they didn’t? 126 PP opportunities (2nd fewest) and 172 PK opportunities (2nd most), resulting in a -11 goal differential on special teams. Verdict: Above average + Bad PPA – PKA difference 12. Texas Renegades (51 points) Record: 23-22-5 Corsi: 49.52 (11th) PDO: 996 (9th) PP + PK: 104.41 (4th) Slightly below average at even-strength and the 996 PDO didn’t help, although I can’t say they were unlucky. Good special teams but Texas had difficulties staying out of the penalty box, which is likely the reason they missed the playoffs. Verdict: Below average + Undisciplined 13. Chicago Syndicate (47 points) Record: 21-24-5 Corsi: 46.86 (15th) PDO: 990 (14th) PP + PK: 103.42 (5th) Syndicate were very bad 5 on 5 this season but they were also pretty unlucky. Verdict: Bad + Unlucky + Good special teams 14. Minnesota Chiefs (46 points) Record: 20-24-6 Corsi: 47.45 (14th) PDO: 991 (13th) PP + PK: 100.32 (7th) Pretty much the same as Chicago, with slightly worse special teams. Verdict: Bad + Unlucky 15. Los Angeles Panthers (41 points) Record: 20-29-1 Corsi: 46.84 (16th) PDO: 992 (12th) PP + PK: 100.65 (6th) Not surprising that the second last team finished with bad possession numbers but what stood out to me is LA went on the PP only 122 times (fewest in the league) and had to kill off 163 penalties (4th most). Verdict: Bad + Unlucky + Bad PPA – PKA differential 16. Manhattan Rage (39 points) Record: 17-28-5 Corsi: 49.44 (9th) PDO: 971 (16th) PP + PK: 97.65 (10th) The reverse Tampa. Below average 5 on 5, mediocre special teams but Manhattan definitely was much better than the last place. Verdict: Below average + Unlucky Team stats *Green - made the playoffs PDO 1 Tampa Bay Barracuda - 1037 2 Winnipeg Jets - 1014 3 Toronto North Stars - 1013 4 West Kendall Platoon - 1012 5 Calgary Dragons - 1005 6 New England Wolfpack - 1001 7 San Francisco Pride - 1001 ---------------------------------------------------- 8 Buffalo Stampede - 998 9 Texas Renegades - 996 10 Hamilton Steelhawks - 996 11 New Orleans Specters - 994 12 Los Angeles Panthers - 992 13 Minnesota Chiefs - 991 14 Chicago Syndicate - 990 15 Edmonton Blizzard - 986 16 Manhattan Rage - 971 CF% 1 New Orleans Specters - 54.69 2 Buffalo Stampede - 53 3 West Kendall Platoon - 52.23 4 Calgary Dragons - 51.58 5 Hamilton Steelhawks - 51 6 San Francisco Pride - 50.94 7 New England Wolfpack - 50.64 ---------------------------------------------------- 8 Texas Renegades - 49.52 9 Manhattan Rage - 49.44 10 Edmonton Blizzard - 49.44 11 Winnipeg Jets - 49.29 12 Toronto North Stars - 48.63 13 Tampa Bay Barracuda - 48.42 14 Minnesota Chiefs - 47.45 15 Chicago Syndicate - 46.86 16 Los Angeles Panthers - 46.84 5v5sh% 1 Tampa Bay Barracuda - 11.7 2 San Francisco Pride - 10.42 3 Toronto North Stars - 10.36 4 Winnipeg Jets - 10.12 5 West Kendall Platoon - 9.59 6 Edmonton Blizzard - 9.37 7 Texas Renegades - 9.35 8 Calgary Dragons - 9.16 9 New England Wolfpack - 9.14 10 Buffalo Stampede - 9.11 11 Los Angeles Panthers - 8.99 12 New Orleans Specters - 8.83 13 Chicago Syndicate - 8.81 14 Manhattan Rage - 8.66 15 Minnesota Chiefs - 8.62 16 Hamilton Steelhawks - 8.57 5v5sv% 1 Tampa Bay Barracuda - 0.92 2 West Kendall Platoon - 0.916 3 Calgary Dragons - 0.913 4 Winnipeg Jets - 0.913 5 Hamilton Steelhawks - 0.911 6 New England Wolfpack - 0.91 7 Toronto North Stars - 0.91 8 Buffalo Stampede - 0.906 9 New Orleans Specters - 0.906 10 Minnesota Chiefs - 0.905 11 Texas Renegades - 0.903 12 Chicago Syndicate - 0.902 13 Los Angeles Panthers - 0.902 14 San Francisco Pride - 0.897 15 Edmonton Blizzard - 0.892 16 Manhattan Rage - 0.884 ---------------------------------------------------------- Skater leaderboards CF% (min. 800 shot attempts) 1) 60.43 Nicholas Williams - LW 2) 59.57 Oisin Fletcher - LW 3) 59.54 Joe Kurczewski - LW 4) 56.72 Sean Stevenson Jr - D 5) 56.59 Oliver Konig - C 6) 56.09 Richard Physt - D 7) 56.03 Hippo Passamus - C 8) 55.64 Viktor Marius - LW 9) 55.54 Louie Garrett - RW 10) 55.4 Piotr Czerkawski - RW RelCF (min. 800 shot attempts) 1) 9.05 Dionyz Vyskoc - RW 2) 8.59 Nicholas Williams - LW 3) 8.45 Jason Visser - C 4) 8.33 Lil Manius - RW 5) 8.18 Crossfit Jesus - RW 6) 7.39 Oisin Fletcher - LW 7) 7.34 Joe Kurczewski - LW 8) 7.07 Noah Konn - RW 9) 6.97 Alex Andani - C 10) 6.73 Louie Garrett - RW IPPEV (min. 20 points) 1) 88.5% Flacko Lagerfield - LW 2) 86.8% Max Mauldin - C 3) 83.8% Cameron Carter II - LW 4) 83.3% Mika Mayfield - LW 5) 83% Joe Kurczewski - LW 6) 82.4% Nicky Pedersen Jr - LW 7) 82.1% Kire Yelkrab - RW 8) 82.1% Daniel Karlsson - RW 9) 80.4% Angelo Odjick - LW 10) 80% Kit Smeb - LW Primary assists 1) 26 Fredrich Koenig - D 2) 26 Flacko Lagerfield - LW 3) 24 Anders Christiansen - C 4) 23 Kristaps Ball - D 5) 22 Otis B.Driftwood - D 6) 22 Tor Tuck - D 7) 22 Joe Kurczewski - LW 8) 21 Mikhail Lokitonov - RW 9) 21 Tigole Bitties - D 10) 20 Jason Visser - C Secondary assists 1) 21 Kristaps Ball - D 2) 19 Tigole Bitties - D 3) 18 Harvey Danger - D 4) 18 Maui - D 5) 17 Charlie Schieck - D 6) 17 Richard Physt - D 7) 17 Chuck Crutchfield - D 8) 16 Anders Christiansen - C 9) 16 Shooter McGavin - LW 10) 16 Gabriel Wong - RW PDO (min. 250 shots on goal for + against) 1) 1071 Nickolas Klaus - C 2) 1069 Kolja Seppanen - RW 3) 1066 Cash Savage - LW 4) 1065 Maui - D 5) 1057 Kristaps Ball - D 6) 1050 Alex Andani - C 7) 1044 Chris York - RW 8) 1043 Mikhail Lokitonov - RW 9) 1042 Willie Fisterbottom - D 10) 1041 Harvey Danger - D Steals (defensemen) 1) 995 Maui - D 2) 989 Tigole Bitties - D 3) 969 Geoff Moore - D 4) 960 Ti-Guy Emond - D 5) 952 Poopity Scoop - D 6) 937 Ludwig Koch Schroder - D 7) 937 Kristaps Ball - D 8) 934 Reginald MacIntyre - D 9) 928 Otis B.Driftwood - D 10) 921 Fredrich Koenig - D Steals (forwards) 1) 565 Robert Phelps - C 2) 488 Mike Izzy - C 3) 449 Rafe Ulrich - LW 4) 434 Luke Thomason - LW 5) 429 Anders Christiansen - C 6) 423 Kevin Hamilton - LW 7) 422 Manuel Gotze - RW 8) 418 Viktor Marius - LW 9) 416 Teddy Cuddles - RW 10) 408 Joe Kurczewski - LW Turnovers (defensemen) 1) 956 Tigole Bitties - D 2) 900 Jon Toner - D 3) 895 Kristaps Ball - D 4) 878 Otis B.Driftwood - D 5) 874 Maui - D 6) 857 Geoff Moore - D 7) 851 Bob Bergen - D 8) 838 Isak Odegard - D 9) 825 Jordan Von Matt - D 10) 807 Maurice Picard - D Turnovers (forwards) 1) 632 Robert Phelps - C 2) 589 Flacko Lagerfield - LW 3) 581 Terrance Nova - RW 4) 566 Joe Kurczewski - LW 5) 561 Luke Atmey - LW 6) 561 Teddy Cuddles - RW 7) 549 Bobby Watson - RW 8) 547 Dani Forsberg - LW 9) 545 Cory Knouse - LW 10) 533 Cameron Carter II - LW STL/TO (defensemen, min. 800 steals + turnovers) 1) 1.619 Oliver Cleary - D 2) 1.457 Samuel Jalopski - D 3) 1.441 Dylan Karlsson - D 4) 1.424 Donny McMasters - D 5) 1.423 Helmuts Akmenlauks - D 6) 1.407 Max Weber - D 7) 1.412 Buck Maverick - D 8) 1.378 Anastasia O'Koivu - D 9) 1.372 Jimmy Cahill - D 10) 1.357 Ostap Maksimov - D STL/TO (forwards, min. 700 steals + turnovers) 1) 0.981 Sulak O'Hritea - RW 2) 0.975 Luke Thomason - LW 3) 0.949 Mike Izzy - C 4) 0.939 Viktor Marius - LW 5) 0.921 Borromini Cannellini - C 6) 0.915 Lil Manius - RW 7) 0.894 Robert Phelps - C 8) 0.889 Kevin Hamilton - LW 9) 0.889 Eric Pelletier - C 10) 0.885 Jeff Brogen - LW 10) 0.865 Noah Konn - RW P60 (forwards, min. 30 points) 1) 3.39 Flacko Lagerfield - LW 2) 3.00 Lil Manius - RW 3) 2.96 Anders Christiansen - C 4) 2.91 Nickolas Klaus - C 5) 2.89 Mikhail Lokitonov - RW 6) 2.81 Alex Andani - C 7) 2.79 Joe Kurczewski - LW 8) 2.76 Louie Garrett - RW 9) 2.75 Jason Visser - C 10) 2.68 Trevor Wilson - LW P60 (defensemen, min. 18 points) 1) 2.66 Kristaps Ball - D 2) 2.10 Zander Rhys - D 3) 2.03 Fredrich Koenig - D 4) 2.00 Chuck Crutchfield - D 5) 1.98 Richard Physt - D 6) 1.90 Maui - D 7) 1.87 Otis B.Driftwood - D 8) 1.87 Isak Odegard - D 9) 1.86 Tigole Bitties - D 10) 1.86 Karsten Kadinger - D ---------------------------------------------------------- Goalie stats Averages: SV% = 0.905 EVSV% = 0.907 PKSV% = 0.896 PPSV% = 0.909 Quality starts (QS) 1) 28 Benjamin Blue 2) 26 Michael McFadden 3) 26 Sebastien Primeau 4) 26 Beaujeaux Biscuit 5) 25 Geezus Kryyst 6) 24 Johannes Leitner 7) 24 Walter Hobbs 8) 24 Aleister Cain 9) 23 Cedric Robinson 10) 22 Cedric Moreau 11) 22 Chris Partridge 12) 20 Kata Vilde 13) 18 Jay Bae 14) 15 Scottey Crawfling 15) 15 Evgueni Marmeladov 16) 15 Tommy Tuck QS% (min 20 total starts) 1) 63.64 Benjamin Blue 2) 62.86 Cedric Moreau 3) 59.52 Geezus Kryyst 4) 59.09 Michael McFadden 5) 59.09 Sebastien Primeau 6) 59.09 Beaujeaux Biscuit 7) 55.81 Walter Hobbs 8) 55.56 Evgueni Marmeladov 9) 54.55 Johannes Leitner 10) 54.55 Aleister Cain 11) 52.27 Cedric Robinson 12) 51.16 Chris Partridge 13) 45.45 Kata Vilde 14) 40.91 Jay Bae 15) 39.13 Eddy Ask Jr 16) 34.09 Scottey Crawfling 17) 34.09 Tommy Tuck Really bad starts (RBS) 1) 17 Scottey Crawfling 2) 9 Michael McFadden 3) 8 Johannes Leitner 4) 8 Sebastien Primeau 5) 7 Walter Hobbs 6) 7 Chris Partridge 7) 6 Tommy Tuck 8) 6 Cedric Robinson 9) 6 Beaujeaux Biscuit 10) 5 Cedric Moreau 11) 5 Kata Vilde RBS% (min 20 total starts) 1) 3.7 Evgueni Marmeladov 2) 4.55 Benjamin Blue 3) 6.82 Jay Bae 4) 9.09 Aleister Cain 5) 9.52 Geezus Kryyst 6) 11.36 Kata Vilde 7) 13.64 Beaujeaux Biscuit 8) 13.64 Cedric Robinson 9) 13.64 Tommy Tuck 10) 14.29 Cedric Moreau 11) 16.28 Chris Partridge 12) 16.28 Walter Hobbs 13) 17.39 Eddy Ask Jr 14) 18.18 Sebastien Primeau 15) 18.18 Johannes Leitner 16) 20.45 Michael McFadden 17) 38.64 Scottey Crawfling Goals saved above average (GSAA, min 20 starts) 1) 21.24 Benjamin Blue 2) 16.25 Geezus Kryyst 3) 14.52 Cedric Moreau 4) 9.89 Beaujeaux Biscuit 5) 6.73 Aleister Cain 6) 4.77 Evgueni Marmeladov 7) 3.69 Sebastien Primeau 8) 2.67 Michael McFadden 9) 2.66 Cedric Robinson 10) 2.38 Kata Vilde 11) 0.14 Johannes Leitner 12) -0.77 Walter Hobbs 13) -4.32 Chris Partridge 14) -6.07 Eddy Ask Jr 15) -9.18 Jay Bae 16) -12.55 Tommy Tuck 17) -20.05 Scottey Crawfling Adjusted GAA (min 20 starts) 1) 2.61 Cedric Moreau 2) 2.62 Benjamin Blue 3) 2.65 Geezus Kryyst 4) 2.84 Beaujeaux Biscuit 5) 2.85 Evgueni Marmeladov 6) 2.91 Aleister Cain 7) 2.94 Sebastien Primeau 8) 2.95 Kata Vilde 9) 2.96 Cedric Robinson 10) 3 Michael McFadden 11) 3.02 Johannes Leitner 12) 3.08 Walter Hobbs 13) 3.12 Chris Partridge 14) 3.21 Jay Bae 15) 3.30 Eddy Ask Jr 16) 3.33 Tommy Tuck 17) 3.55 Scottey Crawfling EVSV% (min 400 save attempts) 1) 0.926 Benjamin Blue 2) 0.922 Beaujeaux Biscuit 3) 0.920 Cedric Moreau 4) 0.917 Kata Vilde 5) 0.916 Geezus Kryyst 6) 0.913 Michael McFadden 7) 0.910 Evgueni Marmeladov 8) 0.910 Cedric Robinson 9) 0.909 Sebastien Primeau 10) 0.908 Johannes Leitner 11) 0.907 Aleister Cain 12) 0.902 Walter Hobbs 13) 0.900 Jay Bae 14) 0.897 Tommy Tuck 15) 0.896 Chris Partridge 16) 0.894 Eddy Ask Jr 17) 0.888 Scottey Crawfling PKSV% (min 100 save attempts) 1) 0.932 Chris Partridge 2) 0.926 Geezus Kryyst 3) 0.924 Aleister Cain 4) 0.910 Evgueni Marmeladov 5) 0.908 Cedric Moreau 6) 0.907 Eddy Ask Jr 7) 0.906 Walter Hobbs 8) 0.898 Johannes Leitner 9) 0.897 Sebastien Primeau 10) 0.895 Scottey Crawfling 11) 0.893 Cedric Robinson 12) 0.890 Jay Bae 13) 0.890 Tommy Tuck 14) 0.884 Benjamin Blue 15) 0.879 Michael McFadden 16) 0.871 Beaujeaux Biscuit 17) 0.870 Kata Vilde
Fordyford
Registered CCII fan club
I think its a stretch to call 1012 PDO lucky (If that's what you are referring to with WKP). One standard deviation of PDO this season is just over 15 (considering this a random sample, which isn't necessarily appropriate but near enough). That means that in almost a third of results would have a PDO of 1012 or higher (that's not particularly lucky, just slightly luckier than average. (This is all approximating PDO to a normal which again I shouldn't be doing because the sample size is small, but I cba to look up last seasons results soooo you're just gonna have to deal with it...) The point is, Tampa's PDO is lucky (99.16 percentile lucky), but WKPs is just slightly above average...
Thanks to @Carpy48 , @sköldpaddor, @Weretarantula, @Bruins10 and @Wasty for sigs Extra special thanks to @Julio Tokolosh for the sick gif one
HoltzFan10
Simmer Simmer
StadiumGambler
Registered Posting Freak
@aaronwilson Does analytics have any explanation for Gagnier and Owens of the Barracuda other than "Shit be wack, yo."
Agent of Nick Brain: Center/Right Winger - Winnipeg Aurora Agent of John Torrance: Advisor to the General Manager - Winnipeg Aurora Agent of Anatoli Terrorov: Head Coach - Colorado Raptors Nick Brain Player Profile: http://simulationhockey.com/showthread.php?tid=91326 Nick Brain Update Thread: http://simulationhockey.com/showthread.php?tid=91332
SlashACM
Registered Certified Swiss Cheese
awils13
Registered Posting Freak 07-26-2019, 05:48 PMFordyford Wrote: I think its a stretch to call 1012 PDO lucky (If that's what you are referring to with WKP). One standard deviation of PDO this season is just over 15 (considering this a random sample, which isn't necessarily appropriate but near enough). That means that in almost a third of results would have a PDO of 1012 or higher (that's not particularly lucky, just slightly luckier than average. (This is all approximating PDO to a normal which again I shouldn't be doing because the sample size is small, but I cba to look up last seasons results soooo you're just gonna have to deal with it...) The point is, Tampa's PDO is lucky (99.16 percentile lucky), but WKPs is just slightly above average... The standard deviation is not gonna be high because almost every team finishes in the 990..1100 range, true. But based on my experience with STHS I expect every team to have a PDO between 995 and 1005, and I consider values outside that range lucky/unlucky and unsustainable. The same works in NHL too. I think Tampa was abnormally lucky this season, WKP was luckier than expected but still lucky. 07-26-2019, 07:15 PMStadiumGambler Wrote: @aaronwilson Does analytics have any explanation for Gagnier and Owens of the Barracuda other than "Shit be wack, yo." Neither contributed offensively and both were pretty bad at suppressing shot attempts. But Barracuda's goalies had a very high SV% when they were on the ice (.937 and .930 respectively), hence the good +/-. Maybe they were good at limiting high-danger shots but there is no shot location data in STHS unfortunately, and I think that's highly unlikely anyway. So carried by @"BoucherFan12", pretty much.
Fordyford
Registered CCII fan club 07-27-2019, 06:04 PMaaronwilson Wrote:07-26-2019, 05:48 PMFordyford Wrote: I think its a stretch to call 1012 PDO lucky (If that's what you are referring to with WKP). One standard deviation of PDO this season is just over 15 (considering this a random sample, which isn't necessarily appropriate but near enough). That means that in almost a third of results would have a PDO of 1012 or higher (that's not particularly lucky, just slightly luckier than average. (This is all approximating PDO to a normal which again I shouldn't be doing because the sample size is small, but I cba to look up last seasons results soooo you're just gonna have to deal with it...) The point is, Tampa's PDO is lucky (99.16 percentile lucky), but WKPs is just slightly above average... Tampa was very lucky (as I said, absurdly lucky). Im just saying WKP's number, while not necessarily consistently sustainable was hardly a shock (They had a much better PDO last season, for example, which was). 1012 is.... good, but not unusual. In fact, since S25 as far as I can see there hasnt been a single season without at least one team above 1012, and in most seasons its between 2-5. It's definitely not an unreasonably high value. Thanks to @Carpy48 , @sköldpaddor, @Weretarantula, @Bruins10 and @Wasty for sigs Extra special thanks to @Julio Tokolosh for the sick gif one
artermis
IIHF Commissioner Patron Saint of the SMJHL
Yey, I'm number one in something!
MWHazard Wrote:i'll playwith anyone Justice,Sep 18 2016, 02:09 PM Wrote:4-0 and 0-4 aren't that different tbh McJesus - Today at 10:38 PM Wrote:FIRE EGGY |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |