Simulation Hockey League

Full Version: Make a maximum gap between passing and scoring
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Just freezing redistributions rewards the people who applied the cheat early on before the league was aware of what they were doing

I mean look at Hamilton, multiple players with more than a 25 point difference...
01-03-2020, 02:37 PMStamkosFan Wrote: [ -> ]Just freezing redistributions rewards the people who applied the cheat early on before the league was aware of what they were doing

I mean look at Hamilton, multiple players with more than a 25 point difference...

I sent SDCore a new scale but idk if they will use it! this would make it a bit better! but all in all its hard to get this done for the whole league!
They did set a gap for regression
Oh we're doing a fuck Hamilton thread again cool
hoes mad x24
we only won 1 round and people are already complaining, big fan
Aren't we going to a new engine or whatever soon anyway? Assuming stats will change with all that.
01-03-2020, 03:40 PMaaronwilson Wrote: [ -> ]we only won 1 round and people are already complaining, big fan

I would get their complaints if we had 50 more shots than Buffalo in the series but we only had 5 more shots.

Our 1700 TPE goalie had an 0.934 save percentage.

Their 800 TPE Goalie had an 0.831 Save Percentage.
the commissioner of the league has 70 passing
To be honest I'd be fine with them enforcing a 20 point gap (if scoring is higher than passing) if HO decided to go that direction. It would be a temporary measure until FHM gets sorted out anyways and it likely wouldn't change that much. I'm not sure this thread was intended to be a 'fuck hamilton' thread as some of my colleagues have pointed out, but I can understand the frustration as it has been a common theme lately.
01-03-2020, 03:57 PMDrunkenTeddy Wrote: [ -> ]To be honest I'd be fine with them enforcing a 20 point gap (if scoring is higher than passing) if HO decided to go that direction. It would be a temporary measure until FHM gets sorted out anyways and it likely wouldn't change that much. I'm not sure this thread was intended to be a 'fuck hamilton' thread as some of my colleagues have pointed out, but I can understand the frustration as it has been a common theme lately.

I think the only reason the others took this as targeting hammy was because of 
Code:
I mean look at Hamilton, multiple players with more than a 25 point difference...
01-03-2020, 03:50 PMWaters Wrote: [ -> ]the commissioner of the league has 70 passing

yeah

and when it came out? his last update was on 13th October! so now is the question in this case when was it sure from HAM that this bug exist? was it before or after? if before ... MKAY ... if after ... DAMN YOU WATERS :D
Leagues a joke pack er up and move on already pals
01-03-2020, 03:46 PMThatDamnMcJesus Wrote: [ -> ]
01-03-2020, 03:40 PMaaronwilson Wrote: [ -> ]we only won 1 round and people are already complaining, big fan

I would get their complaints if we had 50 more shots than Buffalo in the series but we only had 5 more shots.

Our 1700 TPE goalie had an 0.934 save percentage.

Their 800 TPE Goalie had an 0.831 Save Percentage.
Damn aha I wonder how Grok suddenly started posting an .830! So unusual!
01-03-2020, 04:01 PMChris-McZehrl Wrote: [ -> ]
01-03-2020, 03:50 PMWaters Wrote: [ -> ]the commissioner of the league has 70 passing

yeah

and when it came out? his last update was on 13th October! so now is the question in this case when was it sure from HAM that this bug exist? was it before or after? if before ... MKAY ... if after ... DAMN YOU WATERS :D
no damn you
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8