So I have been getting some pushback on including the Razov winners only (which was done to mimic the NHL), so I am taking it to a poll to see if I should be including everyone who was nominated as well. I can see both sides of the argument but don't know if it is worth going back to include all nominees at this point.
So let's let the SHL be the judge: Razov Nominations or just Razov Winners?
I feel like nominations at least help when people think the winner is controversial.
in my opinion all award nominations should be included! a small number but they should be also in
I think Miller had 2 Razov noms so yes
But actually, meh. I like it how it is now, since there really is just 1 winner irl
10-30-2018, 02:17 PMJumpierPancakes Wrote: [ -> ]I think Miller had 2 Razov noms so yes
But actually, meh. I like it how it is now, since there really is just 1 winner irl
yep ... that is the reason why the winner get damn more score points than an nominee
or I missed something?
for them they were very close on a trophy in 5 seasons (nominees) and a winner won just one season this trophy and then where nowhere in nominations and so on ... that should be in the end even or maybe the 5 time nominee should be more worth .... or not?
idk
Bure had 1 razov and 2 noms so pls