05-18-2019, 04:53 AM
![[Image: e0MhaQm.png]](https://i.imgur.com/e0MhaQm.png)
05-28-2019, 03:13 PM
Sig: 6/10
Honestly, I was torn between giving this a 6 and a 7 and decided to go to a 6 for a couple of reasons.
The first one being that the render itself seems to have some little grungey/grainy stockwork applied ontop of it and looks like its taking away from the quality of the signature.
There isnt any lighting source that is a little bothersome because it would look so nice in a signature that is based black and white
The outsides of the sig seem to be lost canvas space. You were better off having a full background and just having it darkened on the outside to give it more definition.
I like the logo with low opacity in the back but it was so low that I had to really look and realize what it was.
A little bit more thought and effort andf this thing would have came out really nice man
TOTAL: 600k + 50k bonus (I know it aint much but this is a typical 6.5 signature to me)
Honestly, I was torn between giving this a 6 and a 7 and decided to go to a 6 for a couple of reasons.
The first one being that the render itself seems to have some little grungey/grainy stockwork applied ontop of it and looks like its taking away from the quality of the signature.
There isnt any lighting source that is a little bothersome because it would look so nice in a signature that is based black and white
The outsides of the sig seem to be lost canvas space. You were better off having a full background and just having it darkened on the outside to give it more definition.
I like the logo with low opacity in the back but it was so low that I had to really look and realize what it was.
A little bit more thought and effort andf this thing would have came out really nice man
TOTAL: 600k + 50k bonus (I know it aint much but this is a typical 6.5 signature to me)