+- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com)
+-- Forum: League Transactions (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=18)
+--- Forum: Draft Central (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=501)
+--- Thread: S10 Expansion Draft (/showthread.php?tid=12900)
- Wadester - 08-30-2012
I'm with Nate on this one, only reason is because to be considered an active you'd think the person would have had to be active in the first place. Chiefs put in a guy who hadn't logged in since creating his player til now still sitting on 155 TPE with 2 posts.
- NateyD - 08-30-2012
Quote:Originally posted by ♕Wadey♕™@Aug 30 2012, 07:31 PM
I'm with Nate on this one, only reason is because to be considered an active you'd think the person would have had to be active in the first place. Chiefs put in a guy who hadn't logged in since creating his player til now still sitting on 155 TPE with 2 posts.
Yup, this guy was never active from day one, so how on earth is he active right now?
What year was he drafted even? Did he ever post in an activity check?
- Serpe x 13 - 08-30-2012
Chiefs for punishment..
- JumpierPegasus - 08-30-2012
Minnesota did not cheat, the way this worked is that you needed a guy who has signed in in the past two weeks. Look who has signed in in the past two weeks. We were perfectly ready to put up an active that has been updating constantly, but we were lucky enough that he signed in.
Show us where in the rules we did something wrong and I will do something about it, don't know what I can do though. However the fact of the matter is, we didn't break, or bend the rules. No loophole, nothing. He is active by the rules, and you can't say otherwise
- NateyD - 08-30-2012
Quote:Originally posted by JumpierPegasus@Aug 30 2012, 07:41 PM
Minnesota did not cheat, the way this worked is that you needed a guy who has signed in in the past two weeks. Look who has signed in in the past two weeks. We were perfectly ready to put up an active that has been updating constantly, but we were lucky enough that he signed in.
Show us where in the rules we did something wrong and I will do something about it, don't know what I can do though. However the fact of the matter is, we didn't break, or bend the rules. No loophole, nothing. He is active by the rules, and you can't say otherwise
Please don't even try to tell me it was a coincidence this guy signed in two weeks ago since being inactive since creation.
I think it was Joe that called someone would do something like this. :lol:
- JumpierPegasus - 08-30-2012
Quote:Originally posted by NathanAD@Aug 30 2012, 05:44 PMProve it's not
Please don't even try to tell me it was a coincidence this guy signed in two weeks ago since being inactive since creation.
I think it was Joe that called someone would do something like this. :lol:
- Secord - 08-30-2012
"Happened" to log in? Somebody sucked his dick by email to get him to log in obviously. It might be in the rules but don't bull shit the entire league like he just happened to pop on to the site and the exact moment you guys needed him to. You guys used a loophole congrats own up to it and all will be well
- JumpierPegasus - 08-30-2012
Quote:Originally posted by Secord@Aug 30 2012, 05:45 PMI can screencap my sent list in my email, I can show you my IM's, Skype everything. I have no contact with this man
"Happened" to log in? Somebody sucked his dick by email to get him to log in obviously. It might be in the rules but don't bull shit the entire league like he just happened to pop on to the site and the exact moment you guys needed him to. You guys used a loophole congrats own up to it and all will be well
- NateyD - 08-30-2012
Quote:Originally posted by Secord@Aug 30 2012, 07:45 PM
"Happened" to log in? Somebody sucked his dick by email to get him to log in obviously. It might be in the rules but don't bull shit the entire league like he just happened to pop on to the site and the exact moment you guys needed him to. You guys used a loophole congrats own up to it and all will be well
Exactly, it's funny seeing him try to lie and say it's pure coincidence. He's either a multi or someone worked hard to get him to log in.
- JumpierPegasus - 08-30-2012
Quote:Originally posted by NathanAD@Aug 30 2012, 05:49 PMShow me proof.
Exactly, it's funny seeing him try to lie and say it's pure coincidence. He's either a multi or someone worked hard to get him to log in.
You can't say someone cheated without proof Nate, and you do it a lot. You guys might think it's coincidence, but I have had no contact with him, and Boon will say the same.
- Carl - 08-30-2012
Quote:Originally posted by Sponges@Aug 30 2012, 06:15 PM
I knew they signed him a month ago. It's not like him stalking him to see if he's updating, so get off my nuts there, bud.
sorry babe :(
- NateyD - 08-30-2012
Quote:Originally posted by JumpierPegasus@Aug 30 2012, 07:50 PM
Show me proof.
You can't say someone cheated without proof Nate, and you do it a lot. You guys might think it's coincidence, but I have had no contact with him, and Boon will say the same.
It's common sense. I never said it had to be the GM's, could easily be players if you wish to vouch for all of your players.
I'm just saying it's bull that he's considered an active player, it's half the leagues fault too, for making the definition of active so shitty.
- Jesster - 08-30-2012
Quote:Originally posted by NathanAD@Aug 30 2012, 07:40 PM
Yup, this guy was never active from day one, so how on earth is he active right now?
What year was he drafted even? Did he ever post in an activity check?
Activity check post is a good point actually.
Edit; Even though it was never in the requirements, so wouldn't be valid.
- JumpierPegasus - 08-30-2012
Quote:Originally posted by NathanAD@Aug 30 2012, 05:53 PMIt could easily be players. However that doesn't mean I told them to do it. I can't say if it wasn't because I have had no contact with the guy. I don't know him, I've never talked to the guy before in my life.
It's common sense. I never said it had to be the GM's, could easily be players if you wish to vouch for all of your players.
And again, who's to say a player DID contact him? If even I don't know, how can you say something like that.
You're not making wild accusations, a player of mine could have very well talked to him, but to say I am cheating insults me. Because even if I had talked to him (I swear I haven't, take my word, I'm being 100% honest) it still wouldn't be cheating. Just morally wrong, and I don't want to do either
- Secord - 08-30-2012
I never claimed to have evidence or did I expect you guys to admit it but it is just to much of a coincedence for some random inactive that hasn't been on since he made his player happens to log in so you can put him in expansion......ya that just "happened"
My only problem honestly is you trying to bs saying you guys had no idea you aren't breaking a rule just own up to it