+- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com)
+-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Forum: Announcements (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Thread: Bank Account Issues (/showthread.php?tid=19878)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
- prettyburn - 09-01-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Grapehead@Aug 31 2016, 02:57 PMThe junior banker disappeared on us partway through the season, so your training was probably just much more behind than normal - I did a bunch of catching up late last week.
I looked the other day and saw I had close to $15mil in the bank.... now I'm sitting at 10.5.... was my media payout subtracted rather than added or something? I don't remember making any 4m payments recently.
- SabresFan - 09-01-2016
I've just started back again and have started to train. I've spent $1.5 million or so. My account is in "FA and Limbo." I've earned more than that from salary and media.
I'm assuming that everything will balance out after the SMJHL draft and my account gets moved. Correct?
- prettyburn - 09-01-2016
Quote:Originally posted by SabresFan@Sep 1 2016, 10:24 AMYep, everything should work out!
I've just started back again and have started to train. I've spent $1.5 million or so. My account is in "FA and Limbo." I've earned more than that from salary and media.
I'm assuming that everything will balance out after the SMJHL draft and my account gets moved. Correct?
- prettyburn - 09-02-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Merica@Sep 2 2016, 10:11 AMGenerally the answer is no, unless you have money coming in, but it is at the discretion of the individual banker. I have never seen a lot of favoritism in that regard - when Baller was extra negative last season I don't think it was because he was particularly close with his banker, and if you're looking at someone in NEW currently I don't think it's because Crutch is particularly softpack-friendly.
I'm curious, asking for a friend, are we allowed to go negative by 4x the allowed amount if we are friends of the bank managers? Or is this just an oversight?
- rrireal - 09-02-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Merica@Sep 2 2016, 09:11 AM
I'm curious, asking for a friend, are we allowed to go negative by 4x the allowed amount if we are friends of the bank managers? Or is this just an oversight?
Hey there! You can let your friend know that each team's banking is handled by their assigned banker, rather than the bank manager, and we assess on a case-by-case basis, often looking at whether funds will be incoming soon or not. If your friend is on Minnesota with you, then I'm their banker, and am usually quite flexible, so they can go ahead and send me a PM with their concerns if they'd like! I'll do my best to accommodate
- Merica - 09-02-2016
6: The new maximum negative for bank accounts is $1,500,000. When you have reached -$1,500,000, the banker will no longer complete any transactions until you bring your balance above -1.5m. If it is discovered you updated even though the banker didn't complete your transaction, you will be disciplined accordingly.
lil is -7.
Not trying to start a shitstorm, but I'm just curious why that's allowed.
- Nike - 09-02-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Merica@Sep 2 2016, 09:25 AM
6: The new maximum negative for bank accounts is $1,500,000. When you have reached -$1,500,000, the banker will no longer complete any transactions until you bring your balance above -1.5m. If it is discovered you updated even though the banker didn't complete your transaction, you will be disciplined accordingly.
lil is -7.
) ) )Softpack stays killing the SHL job game making the rules up as they go
) )
- prettyburn - 09-02-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Merica@Sep 2 2016, 10:25 AMAs I said again, it's up to individual bankers on a case by case basis - they know the general rule and mostly stick to it but occasionally give some leeway. The banking team is generally good about getting their shit down so I try not to micromanage them too much, so if you want an answer on this specific case you'll have to ask <a href='index.php?showuser=2005' rel='nofollow' alt='profile link' class='user-tagged mgroup-7'>CRUTCHFIELD</a> since he processes NEW.
6: The new maximum negative for bank accounts is $1,500,000. When you have reached -$1,500,000, the banker will no longer complete any transactions until you bring your balance above -1.5m. If it is discovered you updated even though the banker didn't complete your transaction, you will be disciplined accordingly.
lil is -7.
Not trying to start a shitstorm, but I'm just curious why that's allowed.
- prettyburn - 09-02-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Nike@Sep 2 2016, 10:27 AMIs Crutch on the Pack now? Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have him on our lines, but sadly I think his team would miss him. :-?
Softpack stays killing the SHL job game making the rules up as they go
- Merica - 09-02-2016
Quote:Originally posted by prettyburn@Sep 2 2016, 09:29 AM
As I said again, it's up to individual bankers on a case by case basis - they know the general rule and mostly stick to it but occasionally give some leeway. The banking team is generally good about getting their shit down so I try not to micromanage them too much, so if you want an answer on this specific case you'll have to ask <a href='index.php?showuser=2005' rel='nofollow' alt='profile link' class='user-tagged mgroup-7'>CRUTCHFIELD</a> since he processes NEW.
Where it does it state in the rules that individual bankers can make their own rules and bend them when they want?
Why have rules in place of you aren't gonna enforce them?
- prettyburn - 09-02-2016
For serious, though - it's probably true that bankers are too nice in general. If you'd like us to start being firmer about reinforcing the limit across the board, we'll start doing that.
- Merica - 09-02-2016
Quote:Originally posted by prettyburn@Sep 2 2016, 09:30 AM
Is Crutch on the Pack now? Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have him on our lines, but sadly I think his team would miss him. :-?
I didn't even check who the banker was, for the record, and now Crutch is gonna be mad at me
)
- Merica - 09-02-2016
Quote:Originally posted by prettyburn@Sep 2 2016, 09:31 AM
For serious, though - it's probably true that bankers are too nice in general. If you'd like us to start being firmer about reinforcing the limit across the board, we'll start doing that.
I mean I'm just saying 5x the negative limit is a little excessive don't you think?
- prettyburn - 09-02-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Merica@Sep 2 2016, 10:31 AMMostly it's because there are a lot of jobs on the site that all take time, so we don't want to punish people because media or graphics is slow, or because their GM is late to post contracts. As I said already though, we can be harsher if that's what the site wants - people seem to have been pretty happy with flexibility in the past though, so I just stuck with that same attitude back when I took over from Ragnar.
Where it does it state in the rules that individual bankers can make their own rules and bend them when they want?
Why have rules in place of you aren't gonna enforce them?
- prettyburn - 09-02-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Merica@Sep 2 2016, 10:32 AMI definitely think it's excessive, yeah, and I wouldn't have processed the transactions. I generally just make sure folks are getting their work done because I know the group is generally reliable and don't get paid anywhere near enough to look at every single person on the bank spreadsheet on a regular basis. But I'll happily remind people not to go so far over the limit - again, I agree it's excessive in this case and wouldn't have allowed it if I was processing it.
I mean I'm just saying 5x the negative limit is a little excessive don't you think?