![]() |
STL Punishment - Printable Version +- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com) +-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Forum: Announcements (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +---- Forum: Suspensions/Punishments (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=226) +---- Thread: STL Punishment (/showthread.php?tid=103426) |
RE: STL Punishment - BadWolf - 02-08-2020 02-08-2020, 12:45 PMWannabeFinn Wrote: Explain the reasoning behind Doyle’s suspension @BadWolfAs commissioner, I do not vote on punishments unless there is a tie. This decision came to under the pretense that she played games in the SMJHL while called up. Those are games she would have not been allowed to play. To make up the fact that she was not supposed to be on the roster, HO felt it was fair to make sure stl did not have an advantage by playing Doyle extra games. RE: STL Punishment - WannabeFinn - 02-08-2020 02-08-2020, 03:02 PMBadWolf Wrote:So why did your decision ultimately stray from precedent? And why did you decide to make up for the error by suspending Doyle rather than requiring STL play an extra 2 backup games?02-08-2020, 12:45 PMWannabeFinn Wrote: Explain the reasoning behind Doyle’s suspension @BadWolfAs commissioner, I do not vote on punishments unless there is a tie. This decision came to under the pretense that she played games in the SMJHL while called up. Those are games she would have not been allowed to play. To make up the fact that she was not supposed to be on the roster, HO felt it was fair to make sure stl did not have an advantage by playing Doyle extra games. RE: STL Punishment - .bojo - 02-08-2020 02-08-2020, 03:09 PMWannabeFinn Wrote:02-08-2020, 03:02 PMBadWolf Wrote: As commissioner, I do not vote on punishments unless there is a tie. This decision came to under the pretense that she played games in the SMJHL while called up. Those are games she would have not been allowed to play. To make up the fact that she was not supposed to be on the roster, HO felt it was fair to make sure stl did not have an advantage by playing Doyle extra games.So why did your decision ultimately stray from precedent? And why did you decide to make up for the error by suspending Doyle rather than requiring STL play an extra 2 backup games? Isn't Doyle sitting out 2 games the same as just playing 2 extra backup games? RE: STL Punishment - WannabeFinn - 02-08-2020 02-08-2020, 03:25 PM.bojo Wrote:No. If they need 2 extra backup games, we can call up Doyle during that time frame. If she’s suspended and we call her up, it doesn’t count towards the suspension.02-08-2020, 03:09 PMWannabeFinn Wrote: So why did your decision ultimately stray from precedent? And why did you decide to make up for the error by suspending Doyle rather than requiring STL play an extra 2 backup games? RE: STL Punishment - golden_apricot - 02-08-2020 02-08-2020, 03:09 PMWannabeFinn Wrote:02-08-2020, 03:02 PMBadWolf Wrote: As commissioner, I do not vote on punishments unless there is a tie. This decision came to under the pretense that she played games in the SMJHL while called up. Those are games she would have not been allowed to play. To make up the fact that she was not supposed to be on the roster, HO felt it was fair to make sure stl did not have an advantage by playing Doyle extra games.So why did your decision ultimately stray from precedent? And why did you decide to make up for the error by suspending Doyle rather than requiring STL play an extra 2 backup games? Because we decided the precident ventured into gross cap punishment and was a shit precident. RE: STL Punishment - WannabeFinn - 02-08-2020 02-08-2020, 03:31 PMgolden_apricot Wrote:So switching the cap punishment to a fine on the management wasn’t enough?02-08-2020, 03:09 PMWannabeFinn Wrote: So why did your decision ultimately stray from precedent? And why did you decide to make up for the error by suspending Doyle rather than requiring STL play an extra 2 backup games? RE: STL Punishment - TnlAstatine - 02-08-2020 PUNISH EVOK SHE IS A FILTHY CHEATER RE: STL Punishment - majesiu - 02-08-2020 ![]() RE: STL Punishment - nour - 02-08-2020 cant say i agree with this take, its a small suspension but regardless evok didnt do anything, it makes 0 sense that she has to take any of this on RE: STL Punishment - SlashACM - 02-08-2020 St Louis goalies and getting suspended, don't even try to name a more iconic duo RE: STL Punishment - Nokazoa - 02-08-2020 02-08-2020, 04:56 PMSlashACM Wrote: St Louis goalies and getting suspended, don't even try to name a more iconic duoslash and slash? i got nothing yet i still hit post RE: STL Punishment - Boomcheck - 02-08-2020 This is a fair punishment and I agree with HO. RE: STL Punishment - Blastmeaway - 02-08-2020 02-08-2020, 12:10 PMTML99 Wrote: punish the goalie because the SMJHL doesn't have systems in place for when goalies get called up seems good TML brings up a very good point here that I think is being glossed over in this thread as well. What is the proper system for teams when their goalie gets pulled up to the SHL? Who is supposed to suit up in backup? RE: STL Punishment - BadWolf - 02-08-2020 02-08-2020, 05:50 PMBlastmeaway Wrote:02-08-2020, 12:10 PMTML99 Wrote: punish the goalie because the SMJHL doesn't have systems in place for when goalies get called up seems good When a goalie gets called up it is up to the smjhl gm to sign a fa goalie to fill that temporarily empty roster spot. This is why shl gms are required to give smjhl gms a 24hr notice of call ups. RE: STL Punishment - Leppish - 02-08-2020 02-08-2020, 05:50 PMBlastmeaway Wrote: TML brings up a very good point here that I think is being glossed over in this thread as well. What is the proper system for teams when their goalie gets pulled up to the SHL? Who is supposed to suit up in backup? I'll do it for 50 bucks. |