![]() |
HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Printable Version +- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com) +-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Forum: Announcements (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +---- Forum: Suspensions/Punishments (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=226) +---- Thread: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings (/showthread.php?tid=118564) |
RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - ACapitalChicago - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 08:48 PMPremierBromanov Wrote: is this 30? no RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - ACapitalChicago - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 08:50 PMACapitalChicago Wrote:08-21-2021, 08:48 PMPremierBromanov Wrote: is this 30? wait shit RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Ragnar - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 08:50 PMACapitalChicago Wrote:08-21-2021, 08:50 PMACapitalChicago Wrote: no commissioner shit posting moment RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - dogwoodmaple - 08-21-2021 in RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Rangerjase - 08-21-2021 Officially onto boomer page. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Thelastheraclid - 08-21-2021 Still bullshit RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - PremierBromanov - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 08:50 PMACapitalChicago Wrote:08-21-2021, 08:50 PMACapitalChicago Wrote: no All according to keikaku RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Thelastheraclid - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 09:12 PMPremierBromanov Wrote:08-21-2021, 08:50 PMACapitalChicago Wrote: wait shit Translator's note: keikaku means plan RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - .bojo - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 09:22 PMThelastheraclid Wrote:08-21-2021, 09:12 PMPremierBromanov Wrote: All according to keikaku fkin weebz RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - CementHands - 08-21-2021 So looking up the most recent infraction, one can find that the punishment levied to sfp for not paying an inactive (granted multiple instances) receives a harsher punishment than this. I remember bringing up no contract payments of inactive players before and it was deemed acceptable because the players were inactive, as long as they were counted on the budget it was fine. I guess I’ve decided I’m really not ok with this outcome, and after sleeping on it and feeling the same and looking at hamilton trade out of any punishment they were given I’m going to keep harping on the fact we need a fundamental change to the punishment / appeal process. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - SlashACM - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 11:04 PMCementHands Wrote: So looking up the most recent infraction, one can find that the punishment levied to sfp for not paying an inactive (granted multiple instances) receives a harsher punishment than this. The trade is so funny too because they got a 1st and a second for a player they got to keep, and the second they lost is FURTHER OUT THAN THE SECOND THEY GOT BACK WTF and a first on top of that. So fucked. I thought the whole thing was "oh no it would be bad for the player to be separated from the team that drafted them, think of the user experience!" And then they trade them a day later RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Jobin - 08-22-2021 08-20-2021, 06:22 PMACapitalChicago Wrote:You were saying?08-20-2021, 06:19 PMleviadan Wrote: it's already page 2 but i still feel like that counts as getting in early for this doozy RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - caltroit_red_flames - 08-22-2021 lee out? RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Ragnar - 08-22-2021 08-22-2021, 12:18 AMcaltroit_red_flames Wrote: lee out? Absolutely RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Evok - 08-22-2021 08-22-2021, 12:18 AMcaltroit_red_flames Wrote: lee out? praise! |