+- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com)
+-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+---- Forum: "Official" Thread Forum (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Thread: Official General NHL Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=60363)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
- Allen - 06-23-2016
Quote:Originally posted by c00kies@Jun 23 2016, 02:22 PMI think that depends on what is in play on the Sabres end. I wouldn't mind either of them tbh, but I think the Sabres have a lot of ammo to make it worthwhile for the Ducks to send over Lindholm.
Sorry, but it's very likely to be Fowler if it's a d-man. Fowler has been made expendable and Anaheim would like to get his contract out too.
Fowler isn't a bad d-man, but I'd put him with a defensively-minded one so that he can focus on offense.
Fowler would paid up well with Ristolainen and would be the LHD we need. Lindholm would just be icing on the cake.
- Allen - 06-23-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Count Chocula@Jun 23 2016, 02:26 PMJokes on you, I've always wanted a stoner jersey.
You rolled a one, you receive Clayton Stoner
- TheLastOlympian07 - 06-23-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Allen@Jun 23 2016, 11:32 AMwhy hes not even that good, hes like a boarderline 7th defenseman....oh wait hehe clever
Jokes on you, I've always wanted a stoner jersey.
- Count Chocula - 06-23-2016
For lindholm youd probably be losing ennis or oreilly
- WannabeFinn - 06-23-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Count Chocula@Jun 23 2016, 03:36 PMI think you mean Reinhart
For lindholm youd probably be losing ennis or oreilly
- Mac - 06-23-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Count Chocula@Jun 23 2016, 04:36 PM
For lindholm youd probably be losing ennis or oreilly
Lindholm really considered that good? I know little about him, but you'd be hard put getting either of those from me.
- GroupMeIsKindOfOkay - 06-23-2016
I couldn't imagine Anaheim moving Lindholm in a deal revolving around Tyler Ennis
- Maxy - 06-23-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Allen@Jun 23 2016, 02:31 PMUnless youre sending over Reinhart ++ Then you can fuck right off about Lindholm. Hell I dont even want that trade. If it was up to me unless Eichels name is in the picture I wouldnt move Lindholm for anything else Buffalo has.
I think that depends on what is in play on the Sabres end. I wouldn't mind either of them tbh, but I think the Sabres have a lot of ammo to make it worthwhile for the Ducks to send over Lindholm.
Fowler would paid up well with Ristolainen and would be the LHD we need. Lindholm would just be icing on the cake.
- Maxy - 06-23-2016
Quote:Originally posted by FuckGroupMe@Jun 23 2016, 02:49 PMYeah I'm sure Anaheim is chomping at the hit to get another high speed, low physicality winger after the Hagelin deal worked so well. He's legitimately the antithesis of everything the Ducks did after the debacle to start the season last season
I couldn't imagine Anaheim moving Lindholm in a deal revolving around Tyler Ennis
- Maxy - 06-23-2016
Hearing Toronto and Anaheim talking as well.
Wonder if Toronto would do something like
To Toronto
Cam Fowler
Clayton Stoner
3rd round pick (2nd if Toronto is playing hard ball)
To Anaheim
JVR
Jonathan Bernier
- Allen - 06-23-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Jon Snow@Jun 23 2016, 02:50 PMRight, I said the Sabres have a lot of ammo to make that trade work
Unless youre sending over Reinhart ++ Then you can fuck right off about Lindholm. Hell I dont even want that trade. If it was up to me unless Eichels name is in the picture I wouldnt move Lindholm for anything else Buffalo has.
)
- Maxy - 06-23-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Allen@Jun 23 2016, 03:11 PMIf Murray trades Lindholm to Buffalo I am going to have to look for a new team to cheer for
Right, I said the Sabres have a lot of ammo to make that trade work
)
- BANNING - 06-23-2016
It's as much 'Tyler Ennis isn't phyical' as it is 'Tyler Ennis isn't very good' in my opinion. Lindholm will be very good, if he isn't already. Ennis will never get better than he is right now. Lindholm can return their choice from a lot of teams. No one has Tyler Ennis on top of their needs board. It's not just poor value, it's a poor fit. Lindholm can return JVR. Not saying he will, but he can. No team trades JVR for Ennis. I'd say it's a rock-paper-scissors scenario but without the absurdity that paper would beat rock.
- Maxy - 06-23-2016
Quote:Originally posted by morphinecv@Jun 23 2016, 03:21 PMIf Anaheim offers Lindholm for JVR, Toronto says yes before Murray can get "holm" out of his mouth. Lindholm is damn damn good already. Hes been referred to more than once as "The NHLs best kept secret" because he flies so far under the radar while being the legitimate rock on one of the better teams since being drafted
It's as much 'Tyler Ennis isn't phyical' as it is 'Tyler Ennis isn't very good' in my opinion. Lindholm will be very good, if he isn't already. Ennis will never get better than he is right now. Lindholm can return their choice from a lot of teams. No one has Tyler Ennis on top of their needs board. It's not just poor value, it's a poor fit. Lindholm can return JVR. Not saying he will, but he can. No team trades JVR for Ennis. I'd say it's a rock-paper-scissors scenario but without the absurdity that paper would beat rock.
- Maxy - 06-23-2016
Quote:Originally posted by morphinecv@Jun 23 2016, 03:21 PMIf Anaheim offers Lindholm for JVR, Toronto says yes before Murray can get "holm" out of his mouth. Lindholm is damn damn good already. Hes been referred to more than once as "The NHLs best kept secret" because he flies so far under the radar while being the legitimate rock on one of the better teams since being drafted
It's as much 'Tyler Ennis isn't phyical' as it is 'Tyler Ennis isn't very good' in my opinion. Lindholm will be very good, if he isn't already. Ennis will never get better than he is right now. Lindholm can return their choice from a lot of teams. No one has Tyler Ennis on top of their needs board. It's not just poor value, it's a poor fit. Lindholm can return JVR. Not saying he will, but he can. No team trades JVR for Ennis. I'd say it's a rock-paper-scissors scenario but without the absurdity that paper would beat rock.