+- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com)
+-- Forum: Player Development (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: SHL Player Progression (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+---- Forum: PT Archive (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=564)
+---- Thread: S81 mPT #2: Expand This (/showthread.php?tid=141600)
S81 mPT #2: Expand This - puolivalmiste - 02-24-2025
We get it, expansion is exciting, but is it going to be the most talked about thing for the next 3 months?
(Very likely)
But infinite growth is just a dream. As we gain more users and teams, wouldn't it be fair to have less of something?
Like money from chirper? Slightly fewer PTs? Maybe lose less TPE to Regression?
So what do you think, what should SHL have less?
(Very likely)
But infinite growth is just a dream. As we gain more users and teams, wouldn't it be fair to have less of something?
Like money from chirper? Slightly fewer PTs? Maybe lose less TPE to Regression?
So what do you think, what should SHL have less?
25 words minimum!
You will receive 1 TPE for fulfilling all requirements.
This PT will close Sunday, March 2nd at 11:59pm PST. Posts submitted/edited after the deadline will receive 0 tpe.
If you have any questions/concerns, please PM me. Tasks with malicious intent will not be graded.
Graders reserve the right to determine what is malicious. You will not be warned.
Graders reserve the right to determine what is malicious. You will not be warned.
This PT is for SHL players and send downs only; it is not for SMJHL Rookies. If your player is S82, this is not for you.
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - Raf_TML - 02-24-2025
mpt pass
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - LALLAREN_1 - 02-24-2025
Back-to-back games. Quebec's schedule has 46 games that are either the start or end of a back-to-back. That is 70% of our games. So yes, less back-to-back please, and thanks.
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - Chris-McZehrl - 02-24-2025
If we expand with 4 Teams I could see here a change. Then the scenary could change to longer careers (Regression Rule Change) or develop faster (PTs). But in the End the members in Charge should also look in the SHL History for the best possible decision.
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - NordicNailer - 02-24-2025
One could hope for slightly less trouble with the simulation.
I would even prefer if the first sim, no matter if it is correct or not, is the one that gets in the books
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - Carpy48 - 02-24-2025
While all of the examples sound interesting, I don't think I'd really want any of them. In general I probably wouldn't mind less things in the league that can stress people. That's very vague but I'm not a fan of unnecessary stress.
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - MuNk22 - 02-24-2025
Maybe less drama in the league? I know there's not a lot of it currently and it can sometimes be a little entertaining but even less of it would make the league more welcoming, I suppose. Then maybe less fantasy or casino, just because I personally don't care for those things too much.
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - sliceruser - 02-24-2025
there is so much about the league that i want more of, to think of something i want less is hard. if i had to choose something it would be like less minimum words for pts and deep dives or something like that.
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - Baron1898 - 02-24-2025
The SHL needs fewer teams with singular plural names like Syndicate, Aurora, Forge, Blizzard, Inferno, etc. etc. It’s overly awkward to refer to players on the team individually and half of them just aren’t good sports team names anyways.
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - Chris - 02-24-2025
I think the SHL is good where it's at, but we probably gonna need a lot more jobs for people to have because with the influx of people there are probably gotta be more job opportunities.
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - ghamss - 02-24-2025
I'm struggling with this most and don't really understand it. Why does expansion mean we need less of something? A growing league is nothing but good for the SHL-verse. Yes, some things will need to change, but I don't know what we'd want less of.
One thing is probably hate. As we get more users, we'll likely encounter more users expressing hate. 1 user expressing hate is too much so we'll need less of that.
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - cake307 - 02-24-2025
I really don't think the SHL needs less of anything right this moment. I suppose less aggressive ramping of regression could work, I suppose, but I wouldn't call it needed, either.
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - Frenchie - 02-24-2025
If anything, I wish for this league to have less division, less animosity, less opposition and vitriol. I know myself to not be a unanimous figure, and I know I have work to do on that end, but if we could all get along, t'would be net!
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - Ivornen - 02-24-2025
Can I ask for less time between PT tasks?
I haven't consistently written this much since college, but I've been having a blast coming up with different scenarios every week. Plus, there's the joy of seeing things checked off that really hits the spot. So, less waiting for tasks, please <3
RE: S81 mPT #2: Expand This - Tripl3tsGamer - 02-24-2025
I think less TPE regression can be good if you want a player to make a 15+ seasons career in the SHL. It can be great to see a load of veterans especially when the expansion teams will come up in action in the next seasons.