Tighten up the rules surrounding FAs in the SMJHL
|
Mutedfaith
Head Office singing solo you can't hear him 05-24-2021, 02:37 PMACapitalChicago Wrote:05-24-2021, 02:14 PMwumaduce Wrote: The IA goalie being played over an active goalie is a problem, for sure. Anyone who would try to circumvent those rules by intentionally not signing an active G, despite them being available should not be a Js GM.
Mutedfaith
Head Office singing solo you can't hear him
On the topic at hand:
I actually was under the (false) impression trading for someone who was IA at that time would have them count as IA, despite signing their contract earlier in the season. Mostly because I believe that's how it should be to prevent the loading up on technically IAs at TDL by teams already playing multiple high TPE IAs in the first place.
boom
SHL GM pure of heart, dumb of ass 05-24-2021, 02:49 PMInf1d3l Wrote:Especially since KEL wasn't doing anything illegal under the current ruleset, so I'm not saying they need to be forfeiting wins or anything. They haven't broken any rules, it's just that the rules we have have potential issues on display.05-24-2021, 02:37 PMMike Izzy Wrote: Legacy?
DeletedAtUserRequest
Registered Posting Freak
05-24-2021, 02:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-24-2021, 04:39 PM by DeletedAtUserRequest.)
05-24-2021, 02:49 PMInf1d3l Wrote:05-24-2021, 02:37 PMMike Izzy Wrote: Legacy? Alright fair enough… Like I said the claim could be valid .. but I defend my guys and this didn’t need to be posted today, 2 hours after our 1st win against booms old team… it came across to me as shitting on us …making any run alittle less valid.. if I was wrong about that…then I apologize. I’ll move out of here and you guys can talk about the issue.
Inf1d3l
IIHF Federation Head Old Man 05-24-2021, 02:52 PMMutedfaith Wrote: On the topic at hand: Technically based on the (current) letter of the rulebook(s) that player is still considered on an "active" contract. Which is the part we're looking into right now
mee
Registered Posting Freak
I think the best answer is to reward teams/GM for player retention. The DSFL is trying that (as I'm sure you guys know) with extra Bots for teams that lose a lot of players. That doesn't work here, and has some flaws there too, but I think the answer has to be a reward for retaining player activity.
golden_apricot
IIHF Federation Head Trade Me 05-24-2021, 02:55 PMmee Wrote: I think the best answer is to reward teams/GM for player retention. The DSFL is trying that (as I'm sure you guys know) with extra Bots for teams that lose a lot of players. That doesn't work here, and has some flaws there too, but I think the answer has to be a reward for retaining player activity. make goalies bots tbh
Samsung virtual assistant
Registered Anime Enthusiast 05-24-2021, 03:51 PMgolden_apricot Wrote:05-24-2021, 02:55 PMmee Wrote: I think the best answer is to reward teams/GM for player retention. The DSFL is trying that (as I'm sure you guys know) with extra Bots for teams that lose a lot of players. That doesn't work here, and has some flaws there too, but I think the answer has to be a reward for retaining player activity. Remove goalies, whoever has the most SOG wins
PremierBromanov
Registered Cool guy
I guess I have a question. Are the RL active -- but site inactive -- players doing the league wrong?
I understand that we want to develop players specifically FOR the SHL, but if a player wants a low-effort presence in the sim and a community to hang around and be involved in, is it such a bad thing that they cap out at 425 and then stop posting on site? Also, wouldnt the current KEL situation yield the same amount of active players per team? Is this player experience valid, or not? And furthermore, can players not take long breaks in their career to address real life stuff? I think we've all seen players dip for a season or two. these are all probing questions, so please dont take them as accusatory. But defining activity is not always an easy thing to do, and furthermore defining how active and in what way players are allowed to be active seems not only tricky, but laden with landmines. Just from what Boom describes, I have a hard time determining if this is exploitative or just being accommodating for a handful of players who dont seem interested in the bigs. I know little of the situation and I don't follow the SMJHL too closely. I am wary of a league that demands your attention and activity. It's one thing to require grind and effort to build your player and have a long and successful career. It's quite another to set the bar of entry so high. To me, as long as someone is in my locker room, i wouldn't have a problem with them being site inactive. That's still engagement and that's still community.
Katth
Player Updaters Player Updaters 05-24-2021, 02:06 PMluketd Wrote:05-24-2021, 01:57 PMMike Izzy Wrote: Boom …last 2 posts I’ve seen of you’rs has you demanding that all Wilson sigs be taken down.. and if they don’t agree with ya there gonna ‘die on your hill’ … Oof, that hurts Luke...
Kierkan
Registered Senior Member
@Keygan
Quote:Sorry each of us have made enough friends to have someone to have our backs, must be an unfamiliar concept. Izzy knows he has lots of people that support him, but that was a solid attempt at trying to put him down. I feel exceptionally lucky that I didn't land with any of these clown GMs, I couldn't imagine being around someone like that on a day to day basis. @sve7en Quote:You and I both know you wouldn't give a shit about this if your precious players legacy wasn't involved. Some of us are actually interested in improving the experience of first gens and J players, you clearly don't belong here. What does this even mean? Throwing a negative connotation on someone who values their time and effort put into the site? That makes literally zero sense. The second part is also a complete joke, and it makes you sound like you have no idea what you're talking about. You should probably stick to making podcasts where you talk over everybody. Maybe next week you'll actually figure out how to equalize your $500 microphone. ______ I don't know enough about the site and the rules to comment on the actual purpose of this thread, but I'm not gonna sit here and watch someone I respect get beat up on by a bunch of goofballs.
ByrdeMan
Buffalo Stampede Arch btw 05-24-2021, 04:10 PMKierkan Wrote: @KeyganMaybe the guy you respect shouldn't come in with some stupid takes.
steveoiscool
Registered Best Sven
amazing how 1 person derailed this suggestion that everyone else is agreeing with
MrRuihu
Registered Senior Member 05-24-2021, 04:00 PMPremierBromanov Wrote: I guess I have a question. Are the RL active -- but site inactive -- players doing the league wrong? /thread |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |