Quote:Originally posted by Sorator@Jan 10 2017, 10:03 AM
I agree that PGS is not a positive thing to have around from my perspective. It sounds like it was started as a "hm, let's see if this works" experiment, and I think it was worth trying, but it doesn't seem to have worked out well.

PTs are at least somewhat interesting to do and different every week; PGS is just the same thing over and over again, just with different names and stats.

That being said, I'd love to hear from some of the folks that put more effort into their PGS submissions; I don't know if some of them enjoy it?

I honestly thought my PGS submissions were pretty solid (especially my 2nd season of doing them, into my 3rd- which was the first year of SHL availability)... but honestly I didn't really like doing them, they took a LOT of time. But, I got a late start in joining and needed to make up TPE on my draft mates. I honestly had started copying the format of my previous posts, and subbing in new "play by play" moments, names and stats.

The thing that made me stop? I got sick of seeing submissions that were half assed (especially once opened up to the SHL) getting full credit for them. I was putting up 1000 word PGS for 3 TPE and seeing others do half as much work and getting the same thing pissed me off. Yeah, I could have just toned it down, but it was more about the principle of it. After this short PT season, I am really missing the extra TPE... but it just didn't feel worth it anymore.