09-16-2018, 11:45 AMToeDragon84 Wrote: Wally said "We don’t have an age restriction and with that being the case we merely educate those that may never be on a path of bigotry and hatefulness that it is okay."

We should not be letting this type of thought based on manipulating a young individuals morals go into the rulebook. While it seems to be trying to do a good thing it's doing it's pretty terrible to let a small group of individuals control words. The rules are meant to keep things running smoothly. It should be nobody's job to ban words, just cause HO feel's capable of handling other peoples speech now doesn't mean they are or will be in the future. We think different things, express them differently and to explicitly take words you don't want to see away is asinine. You may not agree with something added in the future cause things change quick around here. New people will show up, get jobs and make decisions with this garbage? Why would we include such a powerful rule?

Ban people when they behave poorly, don't ban words jesus.

Please don't use Jesus name in vein

As a religious person, this offends me