09-16-2018, 01:12 PMDangles13 Wrote: I appreciate the research but I think we can all agree that people are just hiding behind "free-speech" to bust some balls. The ruling itself was done with good intentions but just fails to hit the mark. Anytime you create a written rule you also create at least one unwritten rule, would be a good idea to think about what those rules might be.

I get that. This was more to educate the ones who possibly didn't know. OR I could be completely wrong on it tbh. I study history not law. But yes it's a tough situation. I didn't want to make this rule but it felt like it had to be done with how the site was going in that TD thread. The amount of hate speech in there was just absurd.