09-16-2018, 02:42 PMligma Wrote:

09-16-2018, 02:40 PMNJBadApple Wrote:

09-16-2018, 02:37 PMTheDangaZone Wrote:

09-16-2018, 02:34 PMFlappyGiraffe Wrote: I don't understand why only these 2 were singled out, plenty of people used that kind of language the past few days. I know they used the words in reference to someone else, but the rule is written that any mention of the words will result in a suspension.

I just posted the correction on this. And it was always contextual. Just worded wrong. That's why they were suspended but some others weren't. Because they were using it with a different definition. That being said I still think there's other words that could be used to express these alternate definitions and I wish we would use them instead of resulting in this type of speech to push buttons and rules for loop holes.

If it's contextual, then why even bother "banning" the word or making a rule about it?  This whole thing is retarding the process of the league moving forward as a welcoming place.

"banned words" = we can suspend who we want and turn a blind eye to whoever else because "context"

lol

You could have stayed in HO and fought it. I mean you were in there when we suspended some others for similar stuff.