11-14-2018, 06:20 PMRomanesEuntDomus Wrote:

11-14-2018, 06:00 PM.bojo Wrote: If you take away the player after banning a person, you're just punishing the team at that point. I think playing the season is a fair compromise.

Yeah I know that's the reasoning, I just don't really agree with it. Most bannings don't come out of nowhere, teams usually know what they are getting themselves into either by acquiring a problematic player or by not doing enough to curb his antics when he is already on the team. Hell often times they get these players for cheap precisely because of these issues. If a team isn't really interested in changing that persons behaviour or not able to then they don't deserve any extra sympathy from the league as far as I'm concerned - in fact, they might've even encouraged that person and sent the signal that he was doing was okay by putting up with him for so long.

There could be cases where you draft someone unknowing of the fact they're the equivalent of human feces, and then no one wants to trade to get them off your team, but you can't drop them because their player is beneficial to the club even if the member isn't. You try to tell them to chill out, but at the end of the day you're not their mother so they choose not to listen. Player gets banned and you want the team to still be punished? Some times your hands are just tied.