01-23-2019, 10:36 AMGCool Wrote:

01-23-2019, 10:29 AM.bojo Wrote: Based only on your post and looking at your post you linked, that sounds like the case. First update was fine. Possibly approved over the cap.

And I checked all the other math and it's fine (small caveat: did not check very closely that the TPE was added correctly).

So
1. Where's my $5M for completing the updater job?
2. Should COL really be punished if Incite updated correctly for his whole career and it wasn't determined until he hit the cap that he had added 4 extra TPE?

The punishment isn't just because he had 4 extra TPE. It's because COL GMs were informed Incite had 4 extra TPE, were given permission to fix the error on Incite's behalf, and failed to do that correction.

HO and Updater teams are to blame for it getting this far, but they took all the appropriate corrective actions when the error was discovered. COL failed to take their step in correcting the issue, so they should be punished. 

Whether it was intentional or not, COL's inaction gave them an unfair competitive advantage. I'm confident COL would not have been punished if they would have appropriately corrected the audited player in a timely manner.