04-22-2019, 10:35 PMNobody Wrote:

04-22-2019, 10:30 PMTommySalami Wrote: I understand the reasoning behind the rule, but the job of HO should be to make decisions impartially on behalf of the SMJHL in situations where the SMJHL cannot be impartial. When those that benefit from the ruling (everyone except COL & STL) disagree with the ruling, the SMJHL HO should take a look at changing the precedent in this situation.

I'm not even suggesting reversing this decision. It's just clear no one wants to play by this rule, so why make us?

And yet I've heard from a number of people that agree with this decision. They just don't have a reason to bitch in this thread. Maybe listening to a vocal minority to set the rules isn't the best idea.

Lmfao at the irony of this statement. You can pick out people all the time who agree with a side that is objectively wrong. You’re just choosing to listen to certain people because it fits your narrative and calling he side you don’t agree with the “vocal minority” cuz it’s a buzzword that people in power use to shut down legitimate complaints. You’ve always been this way, unwilling to listen to people who try and make suggestions about the smjhl and it’s just getting ridiculous at this point.