04-23-2019, 08:20 AMWeretarantula Wrote:

04-23-2019, 07:41 AMSami Wrote: This. No need to pay someone 3M if that one doesn't have any responsibility. If the GMs have to track the picks anyway they can just edit the excel sheet themselves.

A lot of people seem to be calling for my job to be mute, even though it was a previous tracker that commited this error, not me. I have worked hard to stay on top of the sheet, implemented the current Google sheet that we have, and apologised and changed any errors I have made as quickly as I can.

I understand you guys are saying this because HO is making GM's responsible for their picks, but I try and keep it as accurate as possible, so that it can be relied on. I reply to every trade to let the GM's know it's been processed, so that they have the chance to review my input and make sure there's no mistakes. If GM's would like more clarification once a trade has been processed I'm happy to discuss whatever might work better, or in addition to the current system.

Conditional picks are a whole other story, but I asterisk those to make them easier to see and track, and the notes have the links to said condition and also state what they are. It's kind of hard for me to know and track when a condition has been met most of the time, but the GM's let me know and I update it accordingly.

If all of that isn't enough to warrant me getting paid and making my job redundant so be it, but I've tried my best and at this stage of this thread that seems to be what most people want based on what I have read.

I don't think any of the people that's voicing their displeasure is aiming it at you personally, I know you work hard on doing your job proper and you are good at it. What I'd like is the draft tracker sheet's purpose more defined.


Who is it for?
When is it to be used?
What responsibilities does a GM have to the the trackers updater and vice versa?

If all these things are clearly defined there would not be such a big deal today.