05-26-2020, 06:57 AMRomanesEuntDomus Wrote: As I have already said we will be talking about all these things internally and evaluate our process to improve it for the future, if you have stuff to add to this then feel free to do here in public or in PMs with any member of the committee. There are also some things that I would need to add and that I think everyone can do to make this process better for the future. Broadly speaking, I (and many others I would argue) always find the member awards to be some of the hardest ones to vote on, this includes the Littleton but also stuff like Best Coach and Best GMs. When voting on players you can base your votes on actual statistical data and while mistakes can happen there as well, it at least gives everyone a common base to work with. This isn't really a case for the member awards which is why it is so easy for some peoples contributions to be missed or undervalued.

I read everything but ill focus on this, and i fully agree, i personally dont agree with either of the coach or GM winners but its a rough one and what do you value more? its very individual and as you said it could easily become a "win the most games award".

My comment wasn't to shit on the noms really, though in hindsight i saw that Kal was the more qualified, which i myself didnt realise either before it was talked about here. I'm still stuck in the older days when the simmer was always nominated and often won. I havent had a player that has been close to being nominated for anything so i havent been paying enough attention obviously.