02-24-2021, 08:31 PMDuff101 Wrote:

02-24-2021, 06:11 PMEmiko Wrote: The issue is that like I said it's just something I don't like. The branding could be connected to a region and it's something that could be easy to tell to someone who's from the states. But for a person not from America I do not understand the logos of some of them.

Then there's the thing of yeah they're significant to the region but that doesn't excuse something that I personally might not like.

I would say go read my reasoning for doing this again. It's basically me going hey, branding is something super important to me and if I'm not somewhere I like branding wise then it could potentially put me closer to going inactive. I explain why also.

I ranked them on appeal to me personally not cultural ties or anything like that. As a result yes something even if it fits can fall below the grades you set out.

As I said thought this isn't an attack on anyone on the team and if you like the thing that's great it's just not for me and I wanted to write a fun article.

No hard feelings, just having fun.
(lil salty ATL is poo tier with the best secondary logo in the leeg)

02-24-2021, 12:54 PMEmiko Wrote: I like the pride branding i'd just slightly do it different and actually lean more into different things. I get the idea using Lions Pride and stuff like that.

How so? San Francisco Pride is an elite level pun.

First to go into secondary for ATL. Yeah if they used that instead they'd be higher for sure and i would probably have them in C tettering towards B.

As for the Pride, well i think i'd actually lean right into the pride stuff as i know that San Fran is known for having a lot of LGBTQ+ things and that is how i'd lean into it myself. I am a person who is trans so i would love to rep a team that is openly going all in on acceptance and things like that. I get that it is supposed to be a play on that but at the sametime i'd probably go all in like have it as a rainbow logo with a scenary shot of San Fran.