Was two the number?
|
Bayley
ACP Access S13, S15, S16, S25 Challenge Cup Champion
Good afternoon SMJHL!
With the recent expansion announcement, congrats to @overdoo and @Geekusoid on their winning bids. To those who did not get it, do not give up. Do not take it as a shot to what you can do, look for opportunities, keep moving forward. With that, I decided to do a little research on what the number should be? Should there have only been 2 teams to make it a 14 team league, 7 per conference, or would have 4 expansions made more sense? Well, let's take a look at the numbers! First, I looked at the amount of players that each team had to see whether we could even fill 14 or 16 teams. Anaheim Outlaws 21 Anchorage Armada 23 Carolina Kraken 21 Colorado Raptors 23 Detroit Falcons 22 Kelowna Knights 23 Maine Timber 21 Nevada Battleborn 21 Newfoundland Berserkers 21 Quebec City Citadelles 23 St. Louis Scarecrows 21 Vancouver Whalers 23 There are a total of 263 players in the league with an additional many pages of free agents that could easily fill those slots. I mean, the SMJHL is about playing time, so who cares if the last line is filled with inactives or whatever. You want to be able to play and showcase those players and enjoy it. Now, the next thing I looked at was actives. How many players does each team have that physically updated in the last two weeks? Anaheim Outlaws 15 Anchorage Armada 11 Carolina Kraken 16 Colorado Raptors 15 Detroit Falcons 9 Kelowna Knights 12 Maine Timber 16 Nevada Battleborn 15 Newfoundland Berserkers 16 Quebec City Citadelles 15 St. Louis Scarecrows 16 Vancouver Whalers 18 With this, there were 174 players that updated in the last two weeks. That is a super nice percentage of players that updated in the past two weeks. Exactly how many players had updated? Well, 66% of the players updated. That is a fantastic number. How was the breakdown per term? Anaheim Outlaws 71% Anchorage Armada 48% Carolina Kraken 76% Colorado Raptors 65% Detroit Falcons 41% Kelowna Knights 52% Maine Timber 76% Nevada Battleborn 71% Newfoundland Berserkers 76% Quebec City Citadelles 65% St. Louis Scarecrows 76% Vancouver Whalers 78% So, my next thing I looked at was maybe Head Office was worried about people being called up because of the new update scale being a little better for players. So, I took a totally random number (600) and decided to count how many players have over 600 TPE in the SMJHL. To my surprise, there were 51 players that have over 600 TPE and likely could be called up soon. Again, let's look at the breakdown per team. Anaheim Outlaws 6 Anchorage Armada 7 Carolina Kraken 3 Colorado Raptors 6 Detroit Falcons 4 Kelowna Knights 3 Maine Timber 0 Nevada Battleborn 1 Newfoundland Berserkers 7 Quebec City Citadelles 3 St. Louis Scarecrows 7 Vancouver Whalers 4 So, there is a good amount of players that could have 1 season left or be called up. So, where would those players fit in the SHL? Well, it has to do with regressing players, of course. They need to be able to fill a spot! So, how many of each class are regressing? Season 51: 19 players Season 50: 27 players Season 49: 12 players Season 48: 13 players Season 47: 17 players Season 46: 25 players Season 45: 9 players Season 44: 3 players Season 43: 9 players Season 42: 2 players Season 41: 2 players So, when you look at it, the players who are going to be near a place that really would not bode well for them being successful, the Season 41-45, we are only looking at 25 players. That turnover is not that great, while we look at some successful classes coming up. Now, that could be good, but, also, those players will hopefully recreate meaning we need more spots. So, was 2 teams the best number knowing that we will probably need to expand pretty soon given these numbers? Currently, there would be 12.42 players per team in a 14 team league. There would be 10.875 actives in a 16 team league. I feel like 2 solid lines with room for those UDFA would actually be PERFECT, so teams can add those newer players without running out of room. I really think 10 should be the number and with large classes probably incoming, was two actually the number? I decided to do a lot more research on the SMJHL and do a little bit of digging on the numbers. I hope you enjoyed reading. Let me know if you have any questions. Quote:Words: 800 Thank you OrbitingDeath! <3 |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Was two the number? - by Bayley - 07-17-2021, 05:52 PM
RE: Was two the number? - by Nhamlet - 07-18-2021, 01:26 AM
RE: Was two the number? - by Bayley - 07-18-2021, 10:04 AM
RE: Was two the number? - by Nhamlet - 07-18-2021, 12:22 PM
RE: Was two the number? - by luke - 07-18-2021, 12:43 PM
RE: Was two the number? - by Bayley - 07-18-2021, 09:50 PM
RE: Was two the number? - by sve7en - 07-18-2021, 09:56 PM
RE: Was two the number? - by Air Crou - 07-25-2021, 02:12 PM
RE: Was two the number? - by UberBJ - 07-25-2021, 02:20 PM
RE: Was two the number? - by Nhamlet - 07-25-2021, 05:58 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |