08-21-2021, 12:00 AMToast Wrote:

08-20-2021, 09:11 PMLeafs4ever Wrote: ‘Bout what?

This is what I want to learn more about:

1) Why did the owner group feel such urgency to step in and takeover this process?

2) Why did the owner group decide on this specific decision considering how harsh other decisions have been (if opting for "HO decided those" then why did owner group not step in then?)?

3) When deciding the 2nd round punishment did you think to take even two minutes to check when Hamilton's next 2nd is? You understand this punishes future GMs rather than those responsible, right?

4) Why do you feel deadlines don't matter in this situation? Kluster presented a very good case earlier in this thread. Should we assume deadlines are not deadlines now?

5) Why is there no appeal to ridiculous owner group (that of which has two active members) decisions?

1. We just felt time was of the essence in this situation.
2. Punishment was based off a prior punishment related to missed GM tasks, but added on the probation and went from 1 day late to 3 days late because there were 3 prospects.
3. There was discussion about their 2nd being so late, yes. I'm not sure how to respond to the second part. What if the current GMs are still GMs by that time?
4. They signed their prospects before the deadline, that was more important. The reason for the rule in the first place was to stop GMs from hording players. It's very clear that wasn't the case here.
5. Again, not really sure how to answer this one either. However, Nour and Luke are the leaders of this league. If they don't like how this played out they are free to change it to something else.