11-04-2021, 02:00 PMcaltroit_red_flames Wrote:

11-04-2021, 01:57 PMhonkerrs Wrote: I mean we did give you an alternative or more. My official answer is that fixing regression will make much more of an impact and a lot more simple to solve.

I agree builds are boring but this is a video game, no matter what there's always going to be a meta unless like I said you get assigned random attributes or something. No other way around it

I'm fully in favor harsher regression, let's do it!

I've offered ways of incrementally fixing new metas popping up. Do you just believe that's not possible or do you believe that the people who would be put in charge of that would do a bad job?

All I've seen you say is that "we will make periodic balance changes". Sweet that sounds great on paper but let me just reiterate again Why "just balancing" won't work:
1) teams that are bad at tactics will still be bad. Tactics and sliders are a big driver 
2) we blame HO for being biased. Can't wait for the balance team to have people on buf and ham for people to bitch at when suddenly their archetypes are OP
3) we can't even do things fast enough like the index, trading cards, punishments . You really expect a balance team to decide on balancing to prevent a meta from forming? This isn't a dig at those departments, this is a for free website, but just letting you know what in reality will happen