Maybe I'm the only one who thinks this way, but at the moment I don't see a reason why I should even consider recreating. When I joined the league almost 3 years ago it was a fun hobby and I thought if you stayed decicated enough (I have not missed a single AC or PT since joining and I don't even know how many hours of work I've put into the league) you could build a good or even great player and have a chance to win something in the end. That's how it's supposed to work and STHS was random enough so it worked. In comes FHM and if you're not on a top team, forget it, no chance. That hasn't really changed much. Those that were lucky and ended up on the good teams win cup after cup, award after award even if they aren't max earning. Of course they enjoy the league.

We found out that either you have a management group on your team that's super into FHM and has tons of time to test, or you don't. The only option is to leave your team and go to one of the 'good' teams to even have a chance to win. That's what it looks like right now, it might not seem that way to younger players, but it's reality for those that are deep into regression and still haven't won anything. Rebuilding means nothing, we've done that with Toronto, it took a good 2 years and were one of the top teams on paper and did it change anything? No. The new regression scale just mean that I have fewer seasons left to win a cup and I simply don't WANT to leave my team - that's my own decision (and part of the storyline that I would like my player to have).

As long as we can't have real parity - yes, that word again - the league isn't fun anymore, it's broken. And in that case I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking this way. Why would you even try to max earn and be active every week if in the end it's not up to you anyway?