S67 PT #3: It Wasn't Me
Due: October 9th @ 11:59 PM (PST)
|
![]() SHL GM Jack of All Trades
Hockey Prompt:
I generally like the way reviews are done now except for two big exceptions: goalie interference and non-automation. You touched on this in the intro: I have no idea why hockey can't implement the technology used in soccer. It seems so simple for goals, maybe less so for offsides, but basically the same. I'm sure there are AIs out there that can see with much more precision and accuracy what the correct call would be. For Goalie interference, I just don't know. I hate that they even review it. Just make a call and stick with it. When they start looking at it in the video, ghosts seem to pop out and change their mind on things that shouldn't matter. Do I think goalie interference will ever be perfect? No. Do I expect some consistency? Mostly. To me, its dumb that they would call an over-the-glass delay of game penalty but then take 7 minutes to review if it touched the top of the glass. Like, sure it was a delay 100 years ago when they had one puck and someone had to go get it, but now its just a moot point. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Credit to enigmatic, Merica, tweedledunn, and jaypc8237 for sigs |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
11 Guest(s) |