As a referee myself (albeit in a league that has no video review, as installing camera's in our arenas is deemed to expensive. Also, we had cameras over the nets for a season or two, but clubs and rinks failed to properly maintain them), I don't necessarily think there's something wrong with our current video review situation in the top (IIHF, I have zero ideas abouthow video review works in the NHL) leagues. While minor missed calls are a part of the game, the video review and coaches challenge makes it less likely to have these mistakes turn into game-deciding factors. Top leagues also use it for supplementary discipline reasons, which is great, as this way we can take the real idiots out of the game and keep the sport safe and clean.

One issue with the current system however, are the situations in which even the video is inconclusive. However, without adding even more cameras and angles that's a preoblem we're just going to have to live with.

Long break for video reviews can not be called a problem as long as we allow commercial parties to force TV Time-outs on us.