Quote:Written Task: How do you feel about video review in hockey right now? Do long reviews annoy you? Do you think missed calls are just part of the game, or would you want to strive for maximum accuracy? What kind of calls are OK to miss from time to time and what kind of calls need to be as accurate as possible? In a similar vein would you like to see things like goal calls and offsides automated? Should a camera be used to make those calls automatically rather than relying on the ref's human eye? Tell me where you stand on all this kind of stuff! (150+ words)

Video reviews in hockey I think are at a good point, however, I do wish there was more consistency in the review process. Goalie interference penalties are almost never called in the fashion they are supposed to, nor are they called with any sort of consistency. In a perfect world, though, video reviews are used to ensure that the proper calls are being made. No team wants to lose on a mistake, and as much as they may be okay winning on a mistake, I'm sure when it really comes down to it they would rather the proper calls be made regardless of the outcome. I think offsides calls are okay to miss every now and again as long as the offside isn't too egregious. I mean, someone is offside by 0.01 seconds? Who cares, we all know that millisecond didn't contribute to the goal being scored. Goal calls, however, I think should be 100% no matter what. Puck crosses by the slimmest margin? It crossed, period. End of story.