Quote:Originally posted by Leafs4ever@Jan 27 2013, 11:37 PM


That argument came from somewhere because I couldn't of made that up myself.

That's the thing, though. Comparing suspensions will always cause havoc. Have suspensions been rather inconsistent? For the most part, yes, but that comes with the territory. Even the NHL can't suspend hits to the head the same because every case has that one element that's different which causes a different punishment.

Listen, we're not out to get anybody and we're not playing favourites. We're trying our best to make sure everything is fair and equal for everyone. If you cheated, you're going to get punished. Do you have to like it? No, but the easiest way to avoid it is to not cheat.

The commissioners do not make the punishments by themselves so I don't understand that argument every time. There are a group of members who make the call. Are we involved? Of course, but you all seem to think that one commish comes and says "I like that guy, lower his suspension". No, it doesn't work like that.

I understand you are trying to make it fair for everyone but you gotta see that I feel favouritsm is in affect when a guy steals over 100 more TPE yet only gets 3 more games. And a main argument for it was because he was a good member of the league.

As for all the commish choosing in this case the only people who chose to let him be co was Toast and Krever.