What I am saying -- and I think Spangs is too -- is that 'articles' like these should have a different payment criteria. This is not a 1000 word article. This is not a 500 word article. This is a spreadsheet. Yes, it took time to compile [less if you use Excel / Open Office / Libre Office / Google Docs, but I digress], but it is not an article. It's a series of data points.

Shout out threads shouldn't be paid the same as a media article. Rankings shouldn't either. I'm not saying that it's worthless, but it's not an article.

Should Bana get paid? Absolutely. This is a great thing to look at and a fun look back at drafts. But due to the minimal amount of creative content here, it should not be considered an article, and should fall under a separate grading and payment criteria.