03-06-2020, 09:55 PMGrapehead Wrote:

03-06-2020, 09:10 PMgrok Wrote: The rule doesn't look for an agreement, it looks for statements reflecting that the player will sign with the team. Under the rule as written and in that scenario, the GM would at least have standing for a HO hearing.

I mean... we could tighten up the language on the rule, but I would not be in favour of removing this rule.

I wouldn't mind a similar, equitable solution, with heavy emphasis on "equitable". As long as players and GMs are held to the same standard and have the same negotiating options.