e is e as e is to e.


the crux of the problem, then, would be to question "to e or not to e". Faced with this moral and spiritual dilemna, our only choice must be therefore to e - thusly, e becomes e, completing the cycle of e, and reinstating the natural order that e must be e, for e is e as e is to e.

if we were to, heaven forbid, not e, then e would not be e for there would be no e for e to e.

of course, one can only e or not e. There is no in between. Therefore one either contributes to the great cycle of e, or seeks to tear it down, whether through apathy or malice.

however, there is one more way to actively perpetrate the demise of the great e, and that is through the accursed entity known as the 'anti-e' represented as such: ə. That which seeks to end the cycle of e, bringing it to an abrupt halt and usurping the rightful throne of that which is e.

needless to say, only heretics would ever utilise the forbidden glyph, for to do so is to invite doom upon the entire alphabet, for e is the lynchpin through which e becomes e, and therefore is the cornerstone of e itself.


for e is e as e is to e

or so to say



e