Submission Date: 2/9
Submission Link: https://simulationhockey.com/showthread.php?tid=103376
Contested Sig(s): Both, primarily the 1st
Graded Date: 2/20



First: How do those sigs not hit 4 and 3 respectively?



Second:
YOU HAVE GRADERS LITERALLY NOT PUTTING IN THE EFFORT OF LOOKING AT THE POSTS.

"Having the plain white text really doesn't do much, and should have tried to add some effects (stroke, drop shadow, etc) to the text to make it pop."
There is an effect. Another grader explicitly referred to it: "it kind of looks like a light leak/exposure error. pretty cool"

"Doesn't look like this was a cut however."
I included cuts, swaps, and originals. Right below the sigs.

---

I can understand graders having their idea of what a 5/5 sig is. 
I cannot understand why it seems like I'm getting docked for putting out something that looks good, has obvious work done, and isn't Micheal Bay-ed to middle earth and back.