Are True Rookies Going Extinct?
|
![]() Registered S30, S31 and S33 Challenge Cup Champion and Wonderbolt Quote:Originally posted by RomanesEuntDomus@Jul 8 2015, 06:33 PM Don't want to step on any toes, still too new to the league! :lol: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Registered S35 Challenge Cup Champion || DELETE ![]() Registered S10 Challenge Cup Champion Quote:Originally posted by Josh@Jul 9 2015, 12:37 AM Then what exactly are you complaining about if you are a) fine with it and B) we already agreed on the 13-15 protection number :lol: ? Is it just to get rid of all the other suggestions where teams would only get to protect six players or something that nobody is taking serious anyway? ![]() Registered Posting Freak Quote:Originally posted by RomanesEuntDomus@Jul 8 2015, 07:39 PM Well because he hasn't agreed with a 13-15 number I'm assuming :lol: ![]() Registered S30, S31 and S33 Challenge Cup Champion and Wonderbolt Quote:Originally posted by RomanesEuntDomus@Jul 8 2015, 06:39 PM Team's get 0 protection, if a skater is taken they must automatically give up their starting goaltender. Failure to do so will result in a fine and a suspension against the team, up to and including a full season ban. seems fair to me. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Registered S1, S3, S4, S6, S13, S19 and S28 Challenge Cup Champion Quote:Originally posted by RomanesEuntDomus@Jul 8 2015, 03:39 PM Im saying if it is anything less than 15 protected and rookies are up for grabs or the choise of rookie protection and 13 protected then it cripples my team. As I have said for a little while here now ![]() Also just for the memory I became GM in S21. I have been agreeing with you for the most part here. It should be a choice of 15 or 13+ rookies protected. Depending on preference for each gm. ![]() ![]() Registered S10 Challenge Cup Champion Quote:Originally posted by Eggy216@Jul 9 2015, 12:39 AM That's okay, it's just how SHL politics go, people usually are pretty loud and aggressive so if you try to be nice and go for a compromise as early as possible then you'll likely just end up being a pushover ![]() I'm not trying to say that you need to butt heads as much as Josh and I do though :D ![]() Registered S10 Challenge Cup Champion Quote:Originally posted by grimmsterj+Jul 9 2015, 12:40 AM--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1' id='QUOTE-WRAP'><tr><td>QUOTE (grimmsterj @ Jul 9 2015, 12:40 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> The 15 actually was his idea so I'm pretty sure he does ![]() <!--QuoteBegin-Josh@Jul 9 2015, 12:42 AM Im saying if it is anything less than 15 protected and rookies are up for grabs or the choise of rookie protection and 13 protected then it cripples my team. As I have said for a little while here now ![]() Also just for the memory I became GM in S21. I have been agreeing with you for the most part here. It should be a choice of 15 or 13+ rookies protected. Depending on preference for each gm.[/quote] You and me agreeing doesn't work, can't you see that ![]() ![]() Registered Merica's Lover
I don't understand why we should make it any easier for expansion teams tbh. They're expansion they SHOULD be absolutely awful to start. That's part of the territory.
Who was the best player taken in the 2000 NHL expansion draft? I legit have never heard of like 80% of these players and the ones I have heard of were 3rd or 4th line players anyways. For reference, the first overall expansion pick that year played under 300 NHL games... ![]() Registered Posting Freak Quote:Originally posted by RomanesEuntDomus@Jul 8 2015, 07:44 PM What I was saying is he isn't okay with 13 or 14 ![]() ![]() Registered S30, S31 and S33 Challenge Cup Champion and Wonderbolt Quote:Originally posted by RomanesEuntDomus@Jul 8 2015, 06:43 PM I'll get there eventually. After I know I have a spot on an SHL team - expansion or otherwise - and I haven't scared anyone away from drafting me :lol: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Registered Posting Freak Quote:Originally posted by Maxy@Jul 8 2015, 07:44 PM Yeah and the Blue Jackets didn't have a playoff victory until 13 seasons after that. I agree it shouldn't be easy for expansion teams, but I think after 3 or so seasons they should be making the playoffs ![]() Registered S10 Challenge Cup Champion Quote:Originally posted by Eggy216@Jul 9 2015, 12:47 AM I'm sure we'll have a pity pick for you in the 6th round ![]() ![]() Registered S23, S38 Challenge Cup Champion and wittle pretty princess Quote:Originally posted by Maxy@Jul 8 2015, 08:44 PM You are a new member and for the third season in a row, your team has been last place in the standings, you and the other two actives in the locker room accumulate twenty pages of discussion all season. Would you stick around? ![]() ![]() Registered S1, S3, S4, S6, S13, S19 and S28 Challenge Cup Champion Quote:Originally posted by Mac@Jul 8 2015, 03:50 PM The guys on my team have. ![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |