Create Account

Average TPE of an SHL Player
#1
(This post was last modified: 03-03-2020, 06:19 PM by BrewskyBoy.)

So I got a little curious after some conversations in the locker room about what the average TPE was per player in the SHL. The initial estimate was made of 1000 TPE, which seemed to be a reasonable number and a good goal to reach for anybody entering the SHL. But that estimate wasn't enough for me, and I decided to dig in a little deeper and check out each team's current roster as of March 3rd. All numbers used in these calculations were taken directly from each team's roster page and did not take into account any prospects that are currently in the SMJHL. Some teams had filler players at 155 TPE and even a few players lower than this, so a number of calculations were ran that both included these players and also excluded these such outliers.

I ran 4 separate formulas against each team, conference, and the league as a whole. The first calculation that I ran was a simple average. Taking every player on the roster, add up the TPEs to get a total TPE for the team, and divide that total by the number of players on the roster. The second calculation was to get the median TPE value for each team. The median is the number right in the middle of a data set ordered from lowest to highest, which in this case would represent the TPE value of the middle ranked player on a team (for most teams, this is roughly the 10th or 11th best player on the roster). The third calculation was to get the average of the innermost 50% of TPE values. I wanted to exclude the top 25% of players and the bottom 25% of players to chop off outliers on both ends of the spectrum and really focus in on the middle half of the league. The final calculation was to get the average of the top 80% of TPE values. This calculation was done to chop off any low TPE roster fillers in order to focus solely on players that provide at least some value to their team.

With the introduction out of the way, let's start diving into the numbers. I'll first present the 4 calculations for each of the 16 SHL teams, and rank the teams in order from highest to lowest. I'll then present those same 4 calculations for each of the 2 conferences. And then lastly, I'll show how these calculations turn out when ran against the SHL as a whole (again, not including players currently in the SMJHL).

Teams

Simple Average
  1. New England - 1134
  2. Calgary - 1118
  3. New Orleans - 1091
  4. Manhattan - 1087
  5. Los Angeles - 1068
  6. Buffalo - 1061
  7. San Francisco - 1048
  8. Chicago - 1005
  9. Hamilton - 991
  10. Edmonton - 990
  11. Winnipeg - 863
  12. West Kendall - 771
  13. Minnesota - 769
  14. Tampa Bay - 737
  15. Texas - 734
  16. Toronto - 530
Median
  1. New England - 1274
  2. Calgary - 1258
  3. New Orleans - 1121
  4. Manhattan - 1120
  5. Los Angeles - 1108
  6. Chicago - 1068
  7. San Francisco - 1044
  8. Buffalo - 1034
  9. Hamilton - 1033
  10. Edmonton - 952
  11. Winnipeg - 821
  12. West Kendall - 809
  13. Tampa Bay - 765
  14. Minnesota - 758
  15. Texas - 690
  16. Toronto - 503
Innermost 50% Average
  1. Calgary - 1269
  2. Los Angeles - 1247
  3. New England - 1239
  4. San Francisco - 1228
  5. Manhattan - 1218
  6. New Orleans - 1213
  7. Hamilton - 1113
  8. Buffalo - 1099
  9. Edmonton - 1061
  10. Chicago - 1009
  11. Winnipeg - 924
  12. Tampa Bay - 871
  13. West Kendall - 814
  14. Minnesota - 679
  15. Texas - 667
  16. Toronto - 480
Top 80% Average
  1. New England - 1350
  2. Calgary - 1326
  3. New Orleans - 1294
  4. Buffalo - 1283
  5. Manhattan - 1277
  6. Los Angeles - 1271
  7. San Francisco - 1263
  8. Edmonton - 1176
  9. Hamilton - 1153
  10. Chicago - 1133
  11. Winnipeg - 1020
  12. West Kendall - 928
  13. Minnesota - 905
  14. Texas - 892
  15. Tampa Bay - 882
  16. Toronto - 621
There are a lot of numbers to take in here, so I'll pause for a moment to give you a few minutes to digest it all. Obviously some rosters have changed a bit between the end of the regular season and the time that I grabbed these rosters, but for the most part things line up as expected. Teams with a higher average TPE rating are all in the playoffs, while the lower TPE teams missed out. The lone exception to this is Toronto (the lowest TPE at this time) and New England (the highest TPE average at this time). Toronto actually edged out New England for the final playoff spot. I admittedly haven't followed the roster transactions of these teams since then so I don't know if there were any major moves, but I'll leave that up to you the reader to figure out.

Conferences

Simple Average
Western - 958
Eastern - 917

Median
Western - 930
Eastern - 925

Innermost 50% Average
Western - 958
Eastern - 929

Top 80% Average
Western - 1144
Eastern - 1088

Taking a look at the data at a conference level, we can see that the average TPE level of players in the western conference is stronger, though the median player is actually very close. I realized afterwards that it may have also been interesting to break this down to a divisional level but at this point I'm too lazy to go back and run the numbers again.


League (SHL)

Simple Average - 937
Median - 928
Innermost 50% Average - 937
Top 80% Average - 1116

So here we are, the numbers you've all been waiting for. We can finally go back to the original question of "what is the average TPE of an SHL player?". Well, we have a couple of different ways of looking at this. The simple answer would be 937 TPE for the average SHL player. This number came up the same by taking the average of every player in the league, as well as taking the average of just the middle 50% of the league. If you're trying to determine if a player is above or below average, you can feel safe with using 937 as the benchmark. Now with that being said, we also know that there are roster fillers in the league sitting at or near 155 TPE. These roster fillers drag down the average TPE numbers of your more useful and active players. If you want a more accurate benchmark for what is the average TPE of a "useful" player, you may want to use 1116 TPE as that number since it's the average TPE of the upper 80% of the league.

If there are any other numbers that you'd like to see, feel free to leave a reply and I may or may not have a follow-up post with more calculations. I may do a similar post for teams in the SMJHL if the interest is high enough.

DISCLAIMER: These numbers were not double checked and I could have fat-fingered something along the way, so certainly don't hold these numbers as gospel but use them more as a guideline.

word count: ~1200 plus research


[Image: DrbPYHV.png] [Image: UDyqktK.png]
Reply
#2

03-03-2020, 03:22 PMBrewskyBoy Wrote: 1. New England - 1134
16. Toronto - 530

fuck my entire ass simon

[Image: ekovanotter.gif]
thanks @Carpy48 and @frithjofr and @rum_ham and @Julio Tokolosh and @Briedaqueduc for the sigs
Armada Inferno norway
Reply
#3

03-03-2020, 03:35 PMhotdog Wrote:
03-03-2020, 03:22 PMBrewskyBoy Wrote: 1. New England - 1134
16. Toronto - 530

fuck my entire ass simon

ok sure

[Image: 3.png]

Reply
#4

[Image: 679485647622635532.png?v=1]

[Image: ml002.gif]
Credit to Copenhagen, Wasty, FlappyGiraffe, InciteHysteria, and caltroit_red_flames
 [Image: MM4nqx6.png] [Image: Niz2wua.png][Image: egAspOO.png] Knights
[Image: GZ9XvkA.png]



Reply
#5

SImon Tremblay doesn't give a shit about such a simple thing as stats...its the heart that counts

Manhattan Rage | General Manager
[Image: sig-hlemyzd.png]
thanks Sulovilen for the sig!
D | Great Falls Grizzlies | Player Page | Update Page




[Image: 8E70VfU.png]
[Image: image.png]
Reply
#6

All I ever wanted was to be average. Mission accomplished.

[Image: ashford.png]

Whalers
[Image: YztPk3T.png] [Image: 6by0kBi.png]

Renegades  raiders  Finland
Reply
#7

im fucking dying this is absolutely hilarious

[Image: ml002.gif]
Credit to Copenhagen, Wasty, FlappyGiraffe, InciteHysteria, and caltroit_red_flames
 [Image: MM4nqx6.png] [Image: Niz2wua.png][Image: egAspOO.png] Knights
[Image: GZ9XvkA.png]



Reply
#8

03-03-2020, 03:55 PMml002 Wrote: im fucking dying this is absolutely hilarious

[Image: blurrybad.jpg] [Image: zomboy3.png]
Thank you Brandon, Fish, GeckoeyGecko, Karey, Kit, takethehorizon, and Ragnar for the sigs!
[Image: Pw202QP.jpeg]


Player Page || Update page
Reply
#9

03-03-2020, 03:35 PMhotdog Wrote:
03-03-2020, 03:22 PMBrewskyBoy Wrote: 1. New England - 1134
16. Toronto - 530

fuck my entire ass simon

bend it like beckham

[Image: x17WALp.png]||[Image: uNh8ZtE.png]
[Image: luff.png][Image: luff2.png][Image: luff.png]
Reply
#10

03-03-2020, 03:22 PMBrewskyBoy Wrote: Top 80% Average
  1. New England - 1350
  2. Calgary - 1326
  3. New Orleans - 1294
  4. Buffalo - 1283
  5. Hamilton - 1277
  6. Los Angeles - 1271
  7. San Francisco - 1263
  8. Edmonton - 1176
  9. Hamilton - 1153
  10. Chicago - 1133
  11. Winnipeg - 1020
  12. West Kendall - 928
  13. Minnesota - 905
  14. Texas - 892
  15. Tampa Bay - 882
  16. Toronto - 621

So did they find another loophole?

[Image: puolivalmiste2.gif]
Sigs by @Carpy48, @Nokazoa and me


Reply
#11

03-03-2020, 04:09 PMpuolivalmiste Wrote:
03-03-2020, 03:22 PMBrewskyBoy Wrote: Top 80% Average
  1. New England - 1350
  2. Calgary - 1326
  3. New Orleans - 1294
  4. Buffalo - 1283
  5. Hamilton - 1277
  6. Los Angeles - 1271
  7. San Francisco - 1263
  8. Edmonton - 1176
  9. Hamilton - 1153
  10. Chicago - 1133
  11. Winnipeg - 1020
  12. West Kendall - 928
  13. Minnesota - 905
  14. Texas - 892
  15. Tampa Bay - 882
  16. Toronto - 621

So did they find another loophole?

the poophole loophole

[Image: x17WALp.png]||[Image: uNh8ZtE.png]
[Image: luff.png][Image: luff2.png][Image: luff.png]
Reply
#12

03-03-2020, 04:09 PMpuolivalmiste Wrote:
03-03-2020, 03:22 PMBrewskyBoy Wrote: Top 80% Average
  1. New England - 1350
  2. Calgary - 1326
  3. New Orleans - 1294
  4. Buffalo - 1283
  5. Hamilton - 1277
  6. Los Angeles - 1271
  7. San Francisco - 1263
  8. Edmonton - 1176
  9. Hamilton - 1153
  10. Chicago - 1133
  11. Winnipeg - 1020
  12. West Kendall - 928
  13. Minnesota - 905
  14. Texas - 892
  15. Tampa Bay - 882
  16. Toronto - 621

So did they find another loophole?

5th in Scoring TPE but only 9th in Passing TPE...

[Image: hudson.png]
Reply
#13

03-03-2020, 03:51 PMCitizen of Adraa Wrote: SImon Tremblay doesn't give a shit about such a simple thing as stats...its the heart that counts
InTaNgIbLeS.

[Image: olivercastillon.gif]



Thanks @enigmatic, @Carpy48, @Bayley, @Ragnar, @sulovilen, & @dasboot for the signatures!



Reply
#14

Do one on the average tpe of staring goalies

The results may shock you

[Image: unknown.png]



UsaScarecrowsBlizzardSpecters | [Image: specterspp.png][Image: spectersupdate.png] | TimberArmadaSpectersFinland

[Image: cainbanner_35.jpg]
Reply
#15

03-03-2020, 04:55 PMSlashACM Wrote: Do one on the average tpe of staring goalies

The results may shock you

look at my CW
the ancient texts may shock you
:kekw:

[Image: x17WALp.png]||[Image: uNh8ZtE.png]
[Image: luff.png][Image: luff2.png][Image: luff.png]
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)




Navigation

 

Extra Menu

 

About us

The Simulation Hockey League is a free online forums based sim league where you create your own fantasy hockey player. Join today and create your player, become a GM, get drafted, sign contracts, make trades and compete against hundreds of players from around the world.