Poll: Would you want CW and ASW combined into a single task worth 16 TPE? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
Absolutely combine the tasks | 49 | 18.85% | |
Would prefer one combined task | 39 | 15.00% | |
Don't really care | 56 | 21.54% | |
Would prefer two separate tasks | 44 | 16.92% | |
Don't touch anything | 24 | 9.23% | |
I have a pass but would prefer combined task if I didn't | 18 | 6.92% | |
I have a pass and don't care | 18 | 6.92% | |
I have a pass but would prefer separate tasks if I didn't | 12 | 4.62% | |
Total | 260 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
S78 mPT #2: Make Your Vote Count!
Due: Sunday, August 25th @ 11:59 PM PST
|
juniped
Registered Senior Member
There's only one vote I want to see. Voting to bring my hitting sliders back. We all know big HO is afraid of me, I would be too.
Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson
Era Single Season PIM Leader
Benpachi
SHL GM SHL GM
In my mind, the CSW and ASW are the largest opportunities for players to earn TPE and show their writing chops, with the flexibility to do as little or as much work as they like.
To balance the large effort, if some of the larger writing or graphic-based prompts could be preview or posted early so people could begin to formulate ideas or outline written pieces in advance, I think that would be helpful
BadWolf
SHL GM SHL GM
Just vote on everything. Total chaos but also total transparency. But don’t stop at simple polls. Full forms. I’m sure many, like me have a lot of ideas (pts included) that we would love to put out there.
Also have I been under a rock (I have), I haven’t seen the league survey in a hot min.
Frenchie
Commissioner allegedly doing stuff
I think they should stay seperate, and here's why:
- There's always this complaint about offseason being too long. Seperating them in two gives something to do for two weeks instead of one. - Some people, especially the newer players (spoken as a J GM) find writing daunting early on, and having two tasks feels MUCH MUCH MUCH more approachable than having it in one task. - Tying into the above point, having them split means you can potentially have more prompts for either of the tasks, furthering the approachability of the task if you can break it into a lot of smaller parts. - Having it split into two weeks prevents people from missing out on a full 16 if they happen to be unavailable that week, and allows for a longer period of time to do the same amount of work, split into two earning opportunities, making it much easier to get some TPE in such cases. Its an edge case maybe, but it makes it more user friendly. - The reason it was initially split was to promote the ASG a bit more. This would essentially undermine that work. Whether or not it had an impact, in small or in large, feels irrelevant, that would just be going back on something people put time and effort into implementing to improve a feature that lacked some spotlight. - I personally don't understand what there is to gain, besides knocking it early and having some writing time off until the regular PT cycle starts again. Its a case of if it ain't broke, why fix it? However you lean, I have a pass and am likely to have one for the forseeable future, so it won't have an impact on myself. That being said, I think we need to consider first gens especially here in how we think this process through, the old heads have already done it multiple times and know their way around it. @jason kranz sig elite / @sulovilen elite sig
[pbl[S73 - IRE - 8 W | 0 OTW | 4 L - Lost in Round 1[/pbl]
Operation Ivy
Registered Posting Freak
I like having them separated, makes me feel not as stressed to get all of it done at one time and I can space it out a bit.
JKortesi81
SHL GM S32, S40, S42, S45 Challenge Cup Champion
I don't really think it matters, but maybe breaking it up has made it easier for people to do, and it seems like a good way to keep people a little more invested during the offseason. Eh, either way, I have a pass and I don't care.
jaypc8237
SHL GM S72 Four Star Cup Champion
I have had a CW/All-Star pass for the greater part of 3 seasons, but before that, it was one task. And for the season break I did have to do it, I didn’t like it as much as the big, single CW.
skyrrhawk
Registered Posting Freak
Honestly, I think keeping them separate is probably the better idea solely from the standpoint of approachability, and the change to "x number of words" rather than strict limits has also definitely made it a less daunting task. It's still not my favorite, but it's better.
MattyJ
Registered Senior Member
I am actually fine with the way it is. More say in some things would be cool, however it is not a pressing issue for me. Not worried about it.
bjkman
Registered Posting Freak
Speaking in terms of Forum voting, I think this should be the best way to decide MVP would to get the names down to Top 5 via google docs and have the official voting on the website. Fewer links that way.
41 Words
sve7en
SMJHL GM Littleton Award Winner
Ruggsy
Rookie Mentor Committee Posting Freak
Feel like it would be cool if we did some voting for awards noms. I think I slightly prefer these specific tasks being split but really in the end dont care too much
Steelflex
Registered Senior Member
It's no secret this is a league full of certified heartthrobs -- lets vote on the league's hunkiest players and make sure they get the recognition they deserve. It's not all about skill, it's also about looking good while doing it.
Aephino
Registered "king" of the SHL
just let the committee do it. yes the awards usually aren't 100% perfect. but it would be a million times better than popularity contests or something similar. the least active LRs would never get their players awards
Moe7171
Registered Senior Member
I don't really have much of a care for how it is. I guess maybe if it's easier for everyone one way it's probably better to have it that one way.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |