Login

JumpierPegasus · 01-28-2013, 03:27 PM

Quote:Originally posted by OcAirlines@Jan 28 2013, 11:24 AM

It's probably because you are so annoying

Or maybe it's my good ideas :3

or my big "David Winter for commish" thing in my sig Wink

teztify · 01-28-2013, 03:27 PM

Quote:Originally posted by Spangify@Jan 28 2013, 03:26 PM

It was only implemented last season, which is likely why you haven't seen it.

Was I asleep for that one? I don't even remember it :lol:

Spangle · 01-28-2013, 03:28 PM

For the record, here's the rule:

Quote:Loaning
-If you have assigned 3 players to the minors, but are still over the 23 man roster limit and would have to cut a semi-active (member who has logged on in the past two weeks), you may loan a player out to a different minor league affiliate who's affiliates have not assigned the maximum 6 players to their team.

-If you wish to assign a goalie to an NWJHL team, but your affiliate already has a semi-active (logged on in the past two weeks) goalie already, you may loan them to another team.

So it's not like you can just send down anybody and it's not like it's going to be used a ton, but it's there.

**RomanesEuntDomus** · 01-28-2013, 03:29 PM

Quote:Originally posted by JumpierPegasus@Jan 28 2013, 08:27 PM

Or maybe it's my good ideas :3

or my big "David Winter for commish" thing in my sig 

Okay that might be it... Still kinda sad that people think I'm promoting myself like that in my own Sig :D

**RomanesEuntDomus** · 01-28-2013, 03:31 PM

Quote:Originally posted by Spangify@Jan 28 2013, 08:28 PM
For the record, here's the rule:

So it's not like you can just send down anybody and it's not like it's going to be used a ton, but it's there.

Nice, I think it's a good rule, maybe make a quick post in the NWJHL Head Office to remind people that it exists Smile

. It'll probably be rarely used, but just wanted to point it out again because I feel like there has been some teams in the near past that wanted to send-down more players than they could... And some NWJHL-teams who weren't competitive because of a lack of active send-downs.

Carl · 01-28-2013, 03:32 PM

Here's the thing.

The argument keeps being made that they should be able to be sent down because of roster spaces restrictions... yet, the LAP clearly have roster space for both Bleak and Wolf...

This is a case of them wanting to dominate juniors, which is why Bleak is asking for Forward minutes and both of them are practically running the Whalers already behind the scenes...

Gifter of Bikes · 01-28-2013, 03:39 PM

Quote:Originally posted by Spangify@Jan 28 2013, 02:28 PM
For the record, here's the rule:

So it's not like you can just send down anybody and it's not like it's going to be used a ton, but it's there.

I only got 2 send downs from Minnesota. I have room for a 3rd. :lol:

BANACKOCK · 01-28-2013, 03:40 PM

Quote:Originally posted by Secord@Jan 28 2013, 12:14 PM
This thread has actually been impressive lol. Some league issues being brought up and discussed without insults and some general maturity. I likey.

Its because I started it Wink

BANACKOCK · 01-28-2013, 03:44 PM

Quote:Originally posted by Carlzner@Jan 28 2013, 12:32 PM
Here's the thing.

The argument keeps being made that they should be able to be sent down because of roster spaces restrictions... yet, the LAP clearly have roster space for both Bleak and Wolf...

This is a case of them wanting to dominate juniors, which is why Bleak is asking for Forward minutes and both of them are practically running the Whalers already behind the scenes...

Wow, Your deserve an A+. :lol:

OBVIOUSLY. However, we arent breaking rules and theres no reasoning that it shouldnt be allowed.

Let us help juniors and the Whalers instead of lose as a LAP. My activity and such can rub off on the juniors and Ill help em (:

Doesnt hurt learning from someone like bleak, who already has 275-324 TPE

Bayley · 01-28-2013, 04:04 PM

TPE = Total Points Earned whether banked or not, you earned them. This thread is irrelevant.

*Buster* · 01-28-2013, 04:06 PM

Quote:Originally posted by BANACKOCK@Jan 28 2013, 02:44 PM

Wow, Your deserve an A+.  :lol:

OBVIOUSLY. However, we arent breaking rules and theres no reasoning that it shouldnt be allowed.

Let us help juniors and the Whalers instead of lose as a LAP. My activity and such can rub off on the juniors and Ill help em (:

Doesnt hurt learning from someone like bleak, who already has 275-324 TPE

Yeah plus he can teach them how to steal TPE

BANACKOCK · 01-28-2013, 04:09 PM

Quote:Originally posted by Chive On@Jan 28 2013, 01:04 PM
TPE = Total Points Earned whether banked or not, you earned them. This thread is irrelevant.

TPE are also irrelevant unless they are actually used on the player. There should be TPE AND TPU. (324 TPU/374TPE)

BANACKOCK · 01-28-2013, 04:09 PM

Quote:Originally posted by Buster@Jan 28 2013, 01:06 PM

Yeah plus he can teach them how to steal TPE

Exactly. So many great qualities to be taught.

Chris-McZehrl · 01-28-2013, 04:10 PM

Quote:Originally posted by Chive On@Jan 28 2013, 09:04 PM
TPE = Total Points Earned whether banked or not, you earned them. This thread is irrelevant.

LOL that is irrelevant? :lol: :lol: :lol:

how old are you if i can ask you?

the player they are in the regression have the banked TPE earned too!!!! and? this TPE hits not regression! :lol:

~~GroupMeIsKindOfOkay~~ · 01-28-2013, 04:16 PM

Quote:Originally posted by Wadester@Jan 28 2013, 02:16 PM
What happened to everyone begging the NWJHL to not allow people over 325 TPE? Crying when Heiss and SMith were being sent down begging for rule changes.

Heiss was like a 2nd or 3rd year SHL player...kinda different
Smith should have been able to be sent down, but ppl cry

any rookie should be able to player juniors...or we should just completely get rid of PDCs
if youre a 2nd+ year player, then yes, there should be a TPE cap.

punishing bleak because he earned too much TPE as a rookie, just doesnt make any sense to me

Navigation

Extra Menu

About us