Create Account

S51 Regression
#16

11-06-2019, 09:44 PMGrapehead Wrote:
11-06-2019, 06:00 PMBoucherFan12 Wrote: You’re telling me .1 rounds up?

Yes

may i see it?

[Image: unknown.png]



UsaScarecrowsBlizzardSpecters | [Image: specterspp.png][Image: spectersupdate.png] | TimberArmadaSpectersFinland

[Image: cainbanner_35.jpg]
Reply
#17

11-06-2019, 09:51 PMSlashACM Wrote:
11-06-2019, 09:44 PMGrapehead Wrote: Yes

may i see it?

....

no

[Image: Grapehead.gif]
TY NOKA AND VALOR FOR THESE WORKS OF ART
Player Page | Update Page




Stars Battleborn Czechia
Reply
#18

11-06-2019, 09:44 PMGrapehead Wrote:
11-06-2019, 06:00 PMBoucherFan12 Wrote: You’re telling me .1 rounds up?

Yes

....
why?

[Image: BoucherFan12.gif]

[Image: benzeev.gif]

06-11-2021, 05:33 PMKenitohMenara Wrote: [Image: BLUE.jpeg]
Welcome to the hall, Ben!

Reply
#19

11-06-2019, 10:12 PMBoucherFan12 Wrote:
11-06-2019, 09:44 PMGrapehead Wrote: Yes

....
why?

because regression rounds up

[Image: Grapehead.gif]
TY NOKA AND VALOR FOR THESE WORKS OF ART
Player Page | Update Page




Stars Battleborn Czechia
Reply
#20
(This post was last modified: 11-07-2019, 11:08 AM by HoltzFan10.)

11-07-2019, 01:38 AMGrapehead Wrote:
11-06-2019, 10:12 PMBoucherFan12 Wrote: ....
why?

because regression rounds up

Well, 90% of 1281 is 1152.9. Which is the same as taking away 10%. Why doesn’t 1152.9 round up to 1153 if regression rounds up?
This is the reason, universally, why in math we have .5 rounding up and anything under rounding down. It satisfies both methods of taking away a percentage of a number.

[Image: BoucherFan12.gif]

[Image: benzeev.gif]

06-11-2021, 05:33 PMKenitohMenara Wrote: [Image: BLUE.jpeg]
Welcome to the hall, Ben!

Reply
#21

11-07-2019, 11:00 AMBoucherFan12 Wrote:
11-07-2019, 01:38 AMGrapehead Wrote: because regression rounds up

Well, 90% of 1281 is 1152.9. Which is the same as taking away 10%. Why doesn’t 1152.9 round up to 1153 if regression rounds up?
This is the reason, universally, why in math we have .5 rounding up and anything under rounding down. It satisfies both methods of taking away a percentage of a number.

It 1 tpe bro

[Image: unknown.png]



UsaScarecrowsBlizzardSpecters | [Image: specterspp.png][Image: spectersupdate.png] | TimberArmadaSpectersFinland

[Image: cainbanner_35.jpg]
Reply
#22

11-07-2019, 11:00 AMBoucherFan12 Wrote:
11-07-2019, 01:38 AMGrapehead Wrote: because regression rounds up

Well, 90% of 1281 is 1152.9. Which is the same as taking away 10%. Why doesn’t 1152.9 round up to 1153 if regression rounds up?
This is the reason, universally, why in math we have .5 rounding up and anything under rounding down. It satisfies both methods of taking away a percentage of a number.

I think maybe you think I have something to do with this, but I'm just giving you the answer. The SHL rounds all regression up. I'm not telling you it makes sense, I'm not telling you to get over it, but I'm telling you that your regression was rounded up cause everyone's is.

[Image: Grapehead.gif]
TY NOKA AND VALOR FOR THESE WORKS OF ART
Player Page | Update Page




Stars Battleborn Czechia
Reply
#23

11-07-2019, 12:05 PMSlashACM Wrote:
11-07-2019, 11:00 AMBoucherFan12 Wrote: Well, 90% of 1281 is 1152.9. Which is the same as taking away 10%. Why doesn’t 1152.9 round up to 1153 if regression rounds up?
This is the reason, universally, why in math we have .5 rounding up and anything under rounding down. It satisfies both methods of taking away a percentage of a number.

It 1 tpe bro

Clearly TPE doesn't help goalies anyway, or you'd be good amirite?

[Image: Grapehead.gif]
TY NOKA AND VALOR FOR THESE WORKS OF ART
Player Page | Update Page




Stars Battleborn Czechia
Reply
#24

11-07-2019, 12:25 PMGrapehead Wrote:
11-07-2019, 12:05 PMSlashACM Wrote: It 1 tpe bro

Clearly TPE doesn't help goalies anyway, or you'd be good amirite?

It doesn't help anyone or you'd be good too

[Image: unknown.png]



UsaScarecrowsBlizzardSpecters | [Image: specterspp.png][Image: spectersupdate.png] | TimberArmadaSpectersFinland

[Image: cainbanner_35.jpg]
Reply
#25

11-07-2019, 01:11 PMSlashACM Wrote:
11-07-2019, 12:25 PMGrapehead Wrote: Clearly TPE doesn't help goalies anyway, or you'd be good amirite?

It doesn't help anyone or you'd be good too

Well I am shit

[Image: Grapehead.gif]
TY NOKA AND VALOR FOR THESE WORKS OF ART
Player Page | Update Page




Stars Battleborn Czechia
Reply
#26

Conklin Owen is retired, as is Walter Hobbs. The Dude is on Buffalo now too

[Image: VkRiFym.png]





[Image: dankoa2004.gif]
Reply
#27

11-07-2019, 12:24 PMGrapehead Wrote:
11-07-2019, 11:00 AMBoucherFan12 Wrote: Well, 90% of 1281 is 1152.9. Which is the same as taking away 10%. Why doesn’t 1152.9 round up to 1153 if regression rounds up?
This is the reason, universally, why in math we have .5 rounding up and anything under rounding down. It satisfies both methods of taking away a percentage of a number.

I think maybe you think I have something to do with this, but I'm just giving you the answer. The SHL rounds all regression up. I'm not telling you it makes sense, I'm not telling you to get over it, but I'm telling you that your regression was rounded up cause everyone's is.

I guess it do be like that sometimes, but we should probably do something about that to change that

[Image: BoucherFan12.gif]

[Image: benzeev.gif]

06-11-2021, 05:33 PMKenitohMenara Wrote: [Image: BLUE.jpeg]
Welcome to the hall, Ben!

Reply
#28

Hercules Rockefeller Regression - DONE

Guy Incognito - D - #24
Texas Renegades
Season 76
0-0-0
Regular Season - [G 0] [A 0] [Pts 0] [+/- 0] [PIM 0] [Hits 0] [SB 0]

[Image: ERs3IrD.png]





Reply
#29
(This post was last modified: 11-07-2019, 05:58 PM by DeletedAtUserRequest.)

@ArGarBarGar
@Eggy216
@adamantium
@Leafs4ever
@teztify
@Spangle
@SDCore
@Fordyford


All TPE earned before Monday July 22nd should be included in the total listed. Anything earned July 22nd or later is not subject to regression.

Hi HO,

Question... are we prepared to have regression done right after your previous ruling? Are updaters now up to date on how to regress under the updated rules?....Who will be doing the buffalo regression?  We have a GM (wbf) that used 1 word in the above statement to knowingly regress his team illegally for many seasons..  so i want to make sure the new regression rules are prepared to be enforced 100% and not forgotten about before every player and every team adds there’s..

[Image: OnGNB1G.gif]



[Image: cgv4vCv.png]|[Image: 95lCCDx.png]|[Image: KgwtJeY.png]
Knights|Dragons|Austria
Reply
#30

Regress me please

[Image: gotze_team_siggy.png]
[Image: lKRNHAn.png]
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)




Navigation

 

Extra Menu

 

About us

The Simulation Hockey League is a free online forums based sim league where you create your own fantasy hockey player. Join today and create your player, become a GM, get drafted, sign contracts, make trades and compete against hundreds of players from around the world.