Jack Crasher rule
|
grok
Registered Posting Freak 03-06-2020, 08:14 PMKeygan Wrote: I could do 3x4m isn’t an agreement in my eyes, I feel like it’s only an agreement if I re-iterate “So you’re cool with signing 3x4m?” And they say yes. The rule doesn't look for an agreement, it looks for statements reflecting that the player will sign with the team. Under the rule as written and in that scenario, the GM would at least have standing for a HO hearing. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Jack Crasher rule - by grok - 03-06-2020, 12:19 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by Sean - 03-06-2020, 01:40 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by nour - 03-06-2020, 02:03 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by grok - 03-06-2020, 02:32 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by Mutedfaith - 03-06-2020, 02:49 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by ml002 - 03-06-2020, 03:56 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by Mutedfaith - 03-06-2020, 04:55 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by Grapehead - 03-06-2020, 04:03 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by grok - 03-06-2020, 04:28 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by TnlAstatine - 03-06-2020, 05:01 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by Tomasnz - 03-06-2020, 06:06 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by grok - 03-06-2020, 06:57 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by Keygan - 03-06-2020, 08:14 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by grok - 03-06-2020, 09:10 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by Grapehead - 03-06-2020, 09:55 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by grok - 03-06-2020, 10:17 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by Grapehead - 03-06-2020, 10:50 PM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by grok - 03-07-2020, 12:17 AM
RE: Jack Crasher rule - by grok - 03-10-2020, 11:02 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |