S81 mPT #2: Expand This
Due: Sunday, March 2nd @ 11:59 PM PST
|
![]() SHL GM Admiral of the Data Seas ![]() Registered Senior Member
I think it's got to be the new expansion teams, what else would be more interesting than the expansion draft? I'm really interested to see how it works, especially since SSL is also doing an expansion
![]() Graphic Graders Killing you slowly
I would say let's have less CW style tasks to do aka combine the CW and All Star stuff together again! I honestly don't care that much but I couldn't think of anything else to say here.
![]() ![]() ![]() Media Graders Posting Freak
Less time in the offseason would be nice, I know that that time is very much needed, but if were daydreaming, then rolling into the next season after a few weeks and not a month+ would be neat.
![]() Registered Posting Freak
i think that i personally could really benefit from the other team playing less defense when my player is on the ice. This would boost my numbers and make me feel good. Otherwise im not sure what to take away, the new FHM should really throw a wrench in for me mid career so that should be interesting. Maybe less restrictions on what stats we can update and less restrictions on what roles GMs and coaches can use? I know less restrictions is technically more, but you get it.
-----------------------------------------------------
| Czechia
S73 GP:12 G:0 A:0 P:0 +/-:-1
S74 GP:12 G:0 A:5 P:5 +/-:-3
S75 In Progress
-----------------------------------------------------
\
![]() ![]() Registered Posting Freak
I swear to god if yall suggest less money from chirps I'm going to neg Gabe.
On a serious note I think nothing needs to be scaled back regarding TPE/$, but departments like media, IIHF and other depts would need to scale up their teams to handle additional workloads. ![]() ![]() Registered Posting Freak
I certainly don't think many would complain about losing less TPE to regression. I do feel like it's at a good spot where we are now. Even if you are hardly active, you can still do at least somewhat decent on a team's bottom line, but there's also a huge ceiling to constantly improve.
![]() ![]() Graphic Graders S11 Challenge Cup Champion ![]() IIHF Federation Head IIHF GM ![]() IIHF Federation Head Too young for this shit
the shl needs less pt passes. gms and site head office should have to struggle through these point tasks just like every other user on the site.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() All-Star Committee Posting Freak
The SHL and especially the SMJHL should have less of GMs and players who care more about winning than growing the league and the user base and will just keep recreating for the same team ad nauseam.
![]() ![]() Registered Senior Member
I’d like to see fewer cases of players spending their entire career on one team. Free agency is so exciting, but the league does not capitalize on it! If players move around, change the balance of power in the league, hold negotiations to add suspense, it would add so much to the league.
![]() SHL GM Formerly Gyro_Hero
Honestly, a bit less cost across the board. Max-earning takes a very large amount of time and effort, and while that makes it a more prestigious thing to do, it also limits those who aren’t able to commit such large amounts of time to the league - and with so many of my friends either being recent parents or likely to become them, I can’t help but feel they’ll struggle to maintain their builds and fall off - much to the dismay of the league as a whole.
"That way - no, no, a little to the left!" "Oh, shit, not like that wait no -!!" crash!!! "Oh god Cake is gonna hit me again" :'0 ![]() SMJHL GM Senior Member
i think maybe less boring sims! commentators on sims have been so fun, i would love to see more of those! shoutout to those who have commentated sims, y'all did fantastic
![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |