S81 mPT #2: Expand This
Due: Sunday, March 2nd @ 11:59 PM PST
|
![]() SMJHL GM Lord of Lighting the Lamp
It would be nice to have less need for money. Everything is expensive so just maybe the cost of stuff is less. Free would even be better. Cant go wrong there
![]() Simmer Simmer ![]() Registered Posting Freak
The SHL should have less games. Let us have each season be a nice round number, not some weird thing like 66 games. Why is it even 66? Why not 82 like NHL?
![]() ![]() ![]() Player Progression Director be nice to me it's the law
the shl should have less cards in the trading cards shop. there should just be one card, and it costs $10 and everyone gets it and they're happy for the chance to do so! we have so many cards that people ignore 90% of them so i think it would be better if we only had one single card and everyone was instead very grateful for it. maybe the one card could be of every single player in shl history? i dunno just an idea
![]() ![]() Registered Posting Freak
Less TPE to regression flys directly against the fact that expansion is coming. Keeping players around longer and adding and retaining more players leads to needing more roster space. I think too many people have too much money, and if you look at how they accrue that money it's multiple jobs, - I think a lot of jobs are clearly over paid because people are able to stomach more than one. Maybe I'm jaded, but when I did some league management positions it consumed me, it was easily a few hours a day every day. I don't agree that people can take on multiple roles of that requirement and be paid what it is paid at.
![]() Registered Posting Freak
I would say we need less things to not spend money on. AKA: I want more stuff I can spend my money on than training and cards.
![]() Registered Senior Member
People will say that less is more. I disagree. Also please don't touch my chirper money, I desperately need that to stay afloat. Otherwise I'll just wallow in eternal debt... I hold to the hedonistic philosophy that more is more.
![]() Player Progression Director Senior Member
As a Certified Poor Player, I think we definitely need less things to spend money on. My poor wallet, dude. It's like paying bills! I guess I get it, but my wallet hurts every offseason.
![]() ![]() Registered Member
I am taking the bold stance that we absolutely need less regulation losses for whatever team I’m on. I think this is a cause we can all get behind for the good of the site
![]() Head Office egg egg egg egg egg egg egg egg
mPT pass
![]() Registered S15, S16, S24, S34, S38 Challenge Cup Champion
I think teams that play against Seattle should be forced to score fewer goals. Although I think maybe some other teams said the same thing about us because we are scoring a lot less than last season.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() SMJHL GM Posting Freak
There’s lots of things I want more of. More friends, more wins, more goals.
One thing I want less of as a J GM is less tactical restrictions. Now I don’t know the reason behind why and I’m sure there’s a valid one, but I’d love to be able to set more tactics rather than just running the same thing everyone else is. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() SMJHL GM Knights GM
less drama. Seems every season something explodes onto general or the forums. Everyone just chill and love eachother. I don't have enough hair left to deal with drama anymore.
![]() ![]() ![]() Registered S8, S9 Challenge Cup Champion
I want a less seasons in a year. Yes it is great to power through seasons see a career develop as a player grows and eventually regression kicks in. But I miss when a season took a full 60 days of simming and than playoffs. It was exciting getting a game a day and GMs trying to match strategies per team. It created a different kind of strategy and game experience.
![]() Sig by Lazyeye
![]() Sig by DaBoot
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Historian :heart_eyes: |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |