Login

ToeDragon84 · 06-30-2019, 11:13 PM

@Massive Coiler
[Image: GdZCLBn.png]

@"ThatDamnMcJesus"

[Image: FqV3KbL.png]

@fever95

@JSS

*JSS* · 06-30-2019, 11:15 PM

thanks toeman

crutch · 06-30-2019, 11:38 PM

Very nice toe

***Smirnov Light*** · 07-28-2019, 12:52 PM

Sigs
1) I like the idea behind the sig however the render has minimal integration to the sig apart from the color and depth flow behind him which can be seen as a compliment. The text needs work although the idea behind it is something that I could get behind. The placement of the render is very good and when thinking about sigs in a rule of 9 parts the sig does well in that regard -- just needs more work and integration to reach its potential.
2/5

2) This sig is a clear step up from the previous one, the render is well placed a focal point and is integrated into the sig. The text is more effective than the previous one and does not take away ones focus from the sig. A more obvious lighting source would be an upgrade to truly captivate a spectators eye however the ability to truly make the sig bring someones attention to the middle makes up for it.
4/5

3) I am not as much of a fan of this one compared to the others. and the sig itself keeps a very similar style to the other ones. Again any form of lighting source would add to the sig but the stock work and depth is really what brings this to a 3
3/5

4) I really like this one however his face seems pretty washed which is distracting. I like the color schemes and the lighting towards the bottom of the text. I'd say the circle in between the two texts is slightly distracting in a semi-bad/semi-good way as it focuses my eyes in the area rather than just the render itself.
3/5

Total: 3M

Lazyeye · 08-04-2019, 10:10 PM

Arbitration: First sig being moved to a 3/5. Similar comments that smirnov light gave throughout his grading but the sig itself is deserving of a score between 2.5 and a 3, which I decided to more favored a 3.

Total Money Awarded: 250k

Navigation

Extra Menu

About us