08-17-2018, 05:42 PMMike Izzy Wrote:

08-17-2018, 05:26 PMArGarBarGar Wrote:

08-17-2018, 05:06 PMMike Izzy Wrote: I mean.... 90% of the members want to recreate after 10-15 seasons... I don’t see a real need to make this change to cut the heads off of the 5-10 members that love there player, willing to put the time and effort into keeping them viable for a small role and wanting to stick around as that player.

Careers have to end at some point. I don't see the problem with putting some kind of soft cap at the top to incentivise players to retire and make a new one.

i mean.. its an easier stance for you to say at this point as you are winding down your career never having to deal with new harsher regression restrictions. But would you have said the same thing 8 seasons ago? ...  i dont know how long Izzy will play, but i want the same freedoms as Garbanzo has had in his long and illustrious hall of fame career.

I dealt with harsher regression restrictions already. Regression was considered a joke when I started here.

Either way, once you get to where you are in your "40s" as a player, there have to be some restrictions put in place. Right now Garbanzo is about 40 or so, and I personally don't plan on keeping Garbanzo around indefinitely. Would be a major blemish on his career to just keep playing with tons of crappy seasons. If I have another sub-30 point season next year you probably will see a Garbanzo retirement thread coming up soon after.

Edit: Also I am talking about a soft cap. I am in no way advocating for a hard cap where you are forced to retire like the VHL.