09-12-2018, 03:52 PMArGarBarGar Wrote: As someone benefitting from the current system, I am fine with plugging the hole.

Add another tier (15 seasons of regression=25-30% maybe?) and you can't have a productive player indefinitely. You can certainly keep playing afterwards, but you are unlikely to be a decent player indefinitely.

your numbers are far ahead in terms of defenseman.. a stricter regression system completley benifits your legacy as it would bury any chance for a special player to stay as long as you under the same conditions.



History wont be so kind to those that were directly involved in a rule to push Christian Errikson and Esa Arikkanen into retirement.. and im sure the gods of fantasy will most definitley look down upon this ....  but If a change in the regression curve did ever happen... we better change the ERA of the site and start adding asteriks to peoples names (pre and post this change) cause the old stats are dead to anyone moving forward..

Currently:
Alonzo Garbanzo the greatest defender in league history.

New:
Alonzo Garbanzo the greatest defender of the 'Old Regression Era'


Would hate to see a debate on someones legacy like the above all done to stop the 1% of the league that this applies too.