04-16-2019, 05:07 PMligma Wrote: I've made it well known that I'm not at all a fan of the current grading scale to the GFX team, making it mandatory to have jersey changes to get a 9/10 on a signature or higher is a little obscene in my opinion, just because king had a boner for them doesn't mean that they are necessary to make good art.

to me, graphics grading should be primarily focused on rewarding users for techniques and creativity in their signatures, as well as what the final design looks like. if somebody is just starting out in photoshop or GIMP or what have you, bombing them with a 1/10 or a 3/10 doesn't do much to encourage them to continue with learning the program. If you make a solid effort and attempt to actually learn the program and incorporate different techniques into making your signatures (guys have reached out to me and I've helped them and that definitely gets noticed), then I think they should be rewarded.

sorry for the rant.

I think weekly submissions capped at 4 is reasonable, prevents people from dumping signatures they might have made for another league all at once. Plus, a user should never need more than 4 sig's worth of money per week so I think it's reasonable.

701 gave me 0/10 on my first and last two attempts at it. lol